From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Origin of IVD_Sequences.txt Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:20:17 +0900 Message-ID: <87k33qitym.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87oat5mr34.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <831tq1bg4u.fsf@gnu.org> <878uk9mno0.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <83siih9v4g.fsf@gnu.org> <87vbndl36o.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <83mw8p9u8r.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1414084869 23725 80.91.229.3 (23 Oct 2014 17:21:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 23 19:21:02 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XhM4M-0000bW-BQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:21:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42328 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XhM4L-0006WM-SJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:21:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36395) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XhM40-0006UX-JC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:20:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XhM3r-00034R-HH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:20:40 -0400 Original-Received: from shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.161]:43886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XhM3r-0002xF-4G; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:20:31 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CC31C3CD7; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:20:17 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83B951A2D06; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:20:17 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta34) "kale" acf1c26e3019 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.161 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175742 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > In this case, asking the Unicode Consortium seems reasonable. > However, in general, people should not be quick to ask some other > party for its interpretation of some license. Is there a question of interpretation here? I thought that the issue was whether the license applies at all or not (AIUI it appears not to apply, although IMO the intent is for it to apply), which is legally quite a different kettle of fish.