Re: My plans for VC mode

[Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net>]

>>>>> Eric S Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com> writes:
>>>>> Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>:

 >> I'm fine with breaking backward compatibility.  But then please try
 >> to find "all" the out-of-tree backends for Free revision control
 >> systems, and then try to find their maintainer to get them in the
 >> loop.

 > I'd be happy to get the maintainers involved, but I don't have any
 > idea how to go about finding the out-of-tree back ends.  Help would
 > be appreciated.

	FWIW, as a maintainer of vc-mw.el, I’m already following this
	thread (albeit loosely.)

	Sure, I’m all for simplifying the VC-to-backend interface, yet
	I’m somewhat concerned over whether I’d be able to provide
	support for /both/ Emacs 24 and the Git ‘master’ in my code.

	At the very least, I hope that the calling conventions for the
	most basic interface functions my backend provides (including
	registered, state, working-revision, find-revision, checkin,
	print-log) are changed in a kind of a compatible way.  (For
	instance, I could easily make ‘state’ also accept a list of
	files instead of just a single one.  Or so I hope, anyway.)

	Otherwise, I’d rather appreciate if the updated interface could
	use some entirely new function names where the semantics changes
	drastically, so that I can provide functions implementing both
	the old and the new interface.  (I do not think it’s necessary
	for the new VC to support the old interface in this case.)

[…]

-- 
FSF associate member #7257  http://boycottsystemd.org/  … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A