From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Olaf Rogalsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19416: 25.0.50; enhancement of xterm mouse tracking: draging the mouse now generates mouse-movement events Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 15:29:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87k31miecg.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87d27fqjfw.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1419085898 17586 80.91.229.3 (20 Dec 2014 14:31:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 14:31:38 +0000 (UTC) To: 19416@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 20 15:31:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2L43-0006LH-HS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 15:31:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34549 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2L42-00067q-UI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:31:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59669) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2L3s-00067h-06 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:31:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2L3h-0006HQ-1f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:31:15 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42870) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2L3g-0006HI-Uy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:31:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2L3f-0007Ta-VN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:31:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87d27fqjfw.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Olaf Rogalsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 14:31:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19416 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.141908585228719 (code B ref -1); Sat, 20 Dec 2014 14:31:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2014 14:30:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52236 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2L3G-0007Su-NB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:30:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57813) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2L31-0007SR-05 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:30:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2L2r-000607-JU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:30:22 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:37812) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2L2r-000603-Gn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:30:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2L2i-00061c-Fg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:30:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2L2Z-0005ev-F6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:30:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]:55583) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y2L2Z-0005eg-7u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:29:55 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id bs8so7100491wib.1 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 06:29:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aT6wvPxXIV9wIEbemQUBr24YS1ht6cmjA2vvewFsIwg=; b=vb6PtzpvQ5/9tnuhSAdxxLEZDHHYhqQfKFpQ/iZHaVDCJUkoE8KmG0baDMNP04QByi UsQG5znCFBCrK5NlwhxV9+0t1ckyeRBOL3GG3YEvHCN0/jU/70FdWYcgvp8bKxpAmiXt CJIypCXNZSUXT+ZuZvJObcpYrpd7eIFLHIoXUrQZsmOQxH6OlXkwGP2gWgqa8WU96KK1 hB6C0jBLVz4Di2xPORNLQ7Q/DLTFmjke1dRlmLTIZifxx8nxnNTczgfpE0B4Zunb4lMf AUADL3K9SPpT/NKPzDKvxBkcC+g2nxZsW0FR18Xp2mLhrJR4/v82LI6SdfviByc77uUe kW9A== X-Received: by 10.180.100.98 with SMTP id ex2mr15253449wib.58.1419085794644; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 06:29:54 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from blaubaer (p5DD06134.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.208.97.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lg7sm6160579wic.0.2014.12.20.06.29.52 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Dec 2014 06:29:53 -0800 (PST) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.9.6pre2; emacs 25.0.50.1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:97605 Archived-At: >> (defconst xterm-mouse-tracking-enable-sequence >> - "\e[?1000h\e[?1006h" >> + "\e[?1000h\e[?1002h\e[?1005h\e[?1006h" > > I haven't yet looked at the actual code changes, but what happens if you > send those codes to an older xterm? I tested it with xterm patch 262 (from Oct 2010): it works as expected. Xterm is just ignoring the newer control sequences. But I didn't made tests with other terminals like rxvt, which claim to be xterm compatible. Regards, Olaf -- Olaf Rogalsky Schwörhausgasse 5 89073 Ulm