From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ivan Shmakov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19865: tar-untar-buffer: should honor default-directory Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:16:01 +0000 Message-ID: <87k2zkbk26.fsf@violet.siamics.net> References: <87a90gd91b.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <834mqoy9h8.fsf@gnu.org> <8761b4d6f2.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <831tlsy8c3.fsf@gnu.org> <871tlsd5hn.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83y4o0wru8.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq3kborm.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83vbj4wnhi.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423927046 27074 80.91.229.3 (14 Feb 2015 15:17:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:17:26 +0000 (UTC) To: 19865@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 14 16:17:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMeT1-0006S8-Bn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:17:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60134 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMeT0-0000TR-KC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:17:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48085) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMeSx-0000SJ-1d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:17:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMeSs-0002ef-55 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:17:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMeSs-0002eX-1W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMeSr-0001Zv-Jb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:17:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ivan Shmakov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 19865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19865.14239269725999 (code B ref 19865); Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2015 15:16:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43941 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMeS4-0001Yg-10 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:16:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fely.am-1.org ([78.47.74.50]:43806) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMeS1-0001YQ-8V for 19865@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:16:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:References:Subject:To:From; bh=Vx6WGic/DAaAF408LSSOyC3h47fPZLrsro+mOxJNkOs=; b=WdMAcVayRgrRdUJpdFV0H+fKsdnN1gdB/HmSkISIjCNu8wF1GVDhJeF+VUdwcCml0CxP1/vb+BIWdcTc/2yFbEXLlywigj05eYsYpiPyfAqwtjdkbvSg8cPcRGywLoZ73/6nKvAhuJ5+fw86Ghk9F55P70NFpcaJQijZXO2EuZc=; Original-Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMeS0-000315-HN for 19865@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:16:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMeRt-0002Kc-R9 for 19865@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 22:16:01 +0700 Mail-Followup-To: 19865@debbugs.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <83vbj4wnhi.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:56:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99389 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>>>> From: Ivan Shmakov Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:34:21 +0000 [=E2=80=A6] >> It doesn=E2=80=99t if you C-x C-w into a file in a different directory. >> Or is your point that tar-mode buffer=E2=80=99s default-directory should >> /not/ be honored, unless under some specific circumstances (as in: >> for a just loaded .tar file)? > My point is that there is no reason to cater to such user behavior. That is: to the possible use of C-x C-w to save the (possibly modified) Tar archive to a new file in some arbitrary directory? Also to note is that thanks to the tar-new-entry command, it=E2=80=99s possible to create .tar archives entirely in Emacs. Consider: C-x b *new* RET M-x tar-mode RET C-x C-q I newfile RET RET Hello, world! C-x C-s C-x b *new* RET C-x C-w /where/my/tar/files/are.tar RET Now, where do you think M-x tar-untar-buffer RET would unpack this newly created archive? [=E2=80=A6] --=20 FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ =E2=80=A6 3013 B6A0= 230E 334A