From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags test is broken on MS-Windows Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 14:10:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87k2vzsde4.fsf@igel.home> References: <83y4kmdjmj.fsf@gnu.org> <831ti957wp.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5s4uml.fsf@gnu.org> <555F740D.4030304@cs.ucla.edu> <837fs04egz.fsf@gnu.org> <87oalco1mg.fsf@igel.home> <83y4kg2yjc.fsf@gnu.org> <83wq002yct.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv6oo0h3.fsf@igel.home> <83vbfk2x9l.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnhcnym6.fsf@igel.home> <83pp5r3iij.fsf@gnu.org> <838ucf3dh8.fsf@gnu.org> <834mn339p2.fsf@gnu.org> <831ti7389n.fsf@gnu.org> <87oalbsgwl.fsf@igel.home> <83wpzz1qf8.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432383064 23590 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2015 12:11:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 12:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pot@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 23 14:10:55 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8GU-0006j5-6f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:10:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37554 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8GT-00048z-FG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:10:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8GK-00048q-UG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:10:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8GH-0007YN-38 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:10:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:59998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw8G9-0007Rm-5w; Sat, 23 May 2015 08:10:33 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3lv3RW6JYzz3hhf0; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:10:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3lv3RW2Fflzvh20; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:10:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZiCpJMor2bXQ; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:10:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: afErRMRCrB8dr3F+E/dDrSvhDhPDN/IT5HBgzqjZQ+uUx2+e7YwFzyDjpqJpc5rh Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-93-104-184-121.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.184.121]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:10:27 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 815542C3B4F; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:10:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: If I had a Q-TIP, I could prevent th'collapse of NEGOTIATIONS!! In-Reply-To: <83wpzz1qf8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 23 May 2015 14:31:07 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 212.18.0.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186764 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Cc: pot@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 12:54:34 +0200 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > Nonetheless, that's what etags attempts to compute. >> >> That's why it fails. > > It doesn't fail. In which way does it not fail? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."