From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Some projects
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:24:41 +0100
Message-ID: <87k2qabyc6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87wpub9jts.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87eggjar5u.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<87io5uzzv6.fsf@mbork.pl> <87io5uewfm.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87a8r6zuit.fsf@mbork.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40175)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZqPwZ-0000Nu-9E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 14:23:00 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZqPwY-0008Ai-Gw
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 14:22:59 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:49492)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZqPwY-0008Ab-Ak
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 14:22:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87a8r6zuit.fsf@mbork.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Sun, 25
	Oct 2015 19:13:14 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:

> On 2015-10-25, at 17:37, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
>
>> I cannot think of any bad consequence if we tailor "border" in
>> `org-emphasis-regexp-components' to allow everything but white spaces.
>
> I don't know, I guess I would welcome such change!

Done in b4af3f0. We'll see what horrible things happen.

> I see. It was only a proposal. Another possibility could be XML's
> <code> ... </code>. Or maybe the whole idea of short and long syntax
> is bad.

IMO, the latter.

> But I'm afraid that if we want "lightweight markup", we might get
> "impossible to mark up certain strings" (like Emacs keystrokes, which
> are sometimes rather weird, like =C-x ,= - which is unbound by
> default, but possible to use).

The point of escaping mechanism is to extend the set of possible
strings, at the price of a lesser readability. We could see what such
a mechanism could give us.

Regards,