Using #+INCLUDE for a .tex file

Using #+INCLUDE for a .tex file

[Nooreen Dabbish]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 534 bytes --]

Hi,

I would like to include some latex files in my latex export exactly where I
place them in the flow.
I am trying to do this with

#+INCLUDE: file.tex

But this places them at the top of the document above the title. I have
also tried
#+INCLUDE: file.tex src latex
#+INCLUDE: file.tex src LaTeX
which did not include the tex.

I am now resorting to

#BEGIN_LATEX
\include{file}
#+END_LATEX

But  I am unhappy with this solution because I would like to generate the
include line as the raw results of a code block.

Thanks,
Nooreen

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 835 bytes --]

Re: Using #+INCLUDE for a .tex file

[Josiah Schwab]

Hello Nooreen,

> I am now resorting to
>
> #BEGIN_LATEX
> \include{file}
> #+END_LATEX
>
> But  I am unhappy with this solution because I would like to generate the
> include line as the raw results of a code block.

I don't know anything about code block results, but would

@@latex:\include{file}@@

or

#+LATEX: \include{file}

be better?

http://orgmode.org/manual/Quoting-LaTeX-code.html#Quoting-LaTeX-code

Hope that (might) help,
Josiah

Re: Using #+INCLUDE for a .tex file

[Eric S Fraga]

On Thursday,  3 Mar 2016 at 17:13, Nooreen Dabbish wrote:

[...]

> I am now resorting to
>
> #BEGIN_LATEX
> \include{file}
> #+END_LATEX
>
> But  I am unhappy with this solution because I would like to generate the
> include line as the raw results of a code block.

You could ":wrap export latex" the results of the src block that
generates the "\include{}" bit to get the above (noting that the syntax
has changed recently -- old syntax would require :wrap latex, I
believe).

-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.91.1, Org release_8.3.4-626-gb62d55