From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall? Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:39:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87k2e1joi7.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87lgykci0z.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87h997u1rq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87oa3dkct4.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474731649 32025 195.159.176.226 (24 Sep 2016 15:40:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:40:49 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 24 17:40:45 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bnp40-0005l9-3Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:40:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34354 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnp3y-00055y-Hb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:40:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43860) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnp3B-00055b-SH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:39:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnp38-0006st-L0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:39:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:64305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnp38-0006sO-B0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:39:34 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([93.209.92.247]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MRGTX-1bOL2T25IF-00UWUH; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:39:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:57:32 -0400") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Y+/OiOZJJOuD+RLoFTSnxfxihgDflkiZJ7CDDtvUyk3bKJ9xaJs RJLAWEtY/slekBGw8aSCWcE9mbCfaBIc0qa1swafiiZ6jT/5EcmXsSh+aKXQkn6BjB0MjIy 6LUpzUtP4OZAsYdqCfJPl2whlky55FhiRCGeUh6b5vPQ3XRqYTjfGMwGD6ZttCt+4uIsb/v r2OTmqLwt1oppgq7agA9w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:pnvVvxT5MAE=:SHO81yjr7MJf8dsdveChZk 5KLICHVCZ7hVrlJxVjdIopP+Lhyl4uJg8Eb2EQS+qXbL7NQERKeTshbt/6F5oj6oiUdXqYFn0 K1UuTRstbQQ9Xe9cjUHj/fmDadF/m6sYF73GqrCgyJNE01W64VlN87AW/yr99bS7hfup+Sp+e U/tK3Xre3YVE3Tors2nw/JD883FW/cMl9Gv5/tAlVe9KzI60xBc43g42a/9lnq5paIQOcuVDD LWwjQQIhrId7S6Nv+WrbJq3WGzhCIvpipcb68zldL7zBSQ8p7mvylMopBntcXQDzoKKVIcOtx w3ysk9aZz+yeMwBaHeUq9UFa7lxw411fv/PET98pLANDpSlTCpFcdETnHC5G8PeFr9GmdPgsj YufIoMdMq7pH3eN7iH8sAYVehJj3pXqnZpXZSqOjJBMqjTRXCYrOkR0C/w594Tj/wrNEO1qJk PvS9Q5q6hbGrJY+fFJJ0WvenH09GRdov9DvRUTZlnhFaWCT1bIBZsFizJKxB2qRII1d5RMV7a iyxIb6piqPxyF2ULBNjVJOVP+UoRGQNH1KmKvbKiIOEaD5CFUfEssKTcVyoLNJHZPqFJzMoJb /OccHYooHy6HQ6b4gZGbKFC2NG5jREW17DqqRaB+PLRonk29bxIlNKGcSg+mN6hxFm+qJTOOv /Pm7dLNs3DaCTKeQxjMaA5unQ/Hwg5zM9p0WANxmQVuk0STw0pFQTCTmPtTXUncU7tcXEyLCa qnSQ6qtBZUj0UwIzDsqyMI2HPIUBtQry+0YWIRYKhxNHfJ90daLfadnAUyhNl7cOdSxFXemV X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207753 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >>> There's (if (fboundp ') ( )) already (which is much >> Your code snippet misses the `with-no-warnings' umbrella. > > No, it doesn't: the byte-compiler understands the the if+fboundp means > that any call to this function in the branch is "safe" and it won't > signal a warning. That's my point. With Emacs 25, yes. But there are still warnings when compiling with Emacs 23, I believe. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.