From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23738: [feature request] eww allow multiple buffer Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 23:41:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87k29kdqsb.fsf@gnus.org> References: <575A79D9.9080200@easy-emacs.de> <87wpdkkudx.fsf@gnus.org> <877f5kgk20.fsf@udel.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485298635 4804 195.159.176.226 (24 Jan 2017 22:57:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 22:57:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 23738@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mark Oteiza Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 24 23:57:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWA1N-0000AW-E1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 23:57:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56231 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWA1S-0000UX-Nj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:57:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42200) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cW9mu-0004qt-V7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cW9mr-0007Az-Rz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cW9mr-0007Av-Ox for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cW9mr-00032H-Ij for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:42:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 22:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23738 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 23738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23738.148529771211653 (code B ref 23738); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 22:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2017 22:41:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40999 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cW9mh-00031t-Oe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:41:51 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:51386) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cW9mf-00031l-Nw for 23738@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:41:50 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.49.21.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.49.21] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cW9mc-0003r7-Gq; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 23:41:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877f5kgk20.fsf@udel.edu> (Mark Oteiza's message of "Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:38:47 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128403 Archived-At: Mark Oteiza writes: > What happens when I navigate to another site in the same buffer? Then > the buffer name is deceptive. Both s and S show the site and/or title, > and the header line of the eww buffer always has both, so this change seems > strange IMHO. Hm, yes, that's true. And changing the name of the buffer as you follow links isn't very nice, either. I think. Hm... so perhaps I should revert that change unless anybody has any other thoughts on this... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no