From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A problem with old bugs Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 07:15:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87k28162aa.fsf@jane> References: <87r32h9zj4.fsf@jane> <83h93dnf9h.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488867319 10581 195.159.176.226 (7 Mar 2017 06:15:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:15:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 07 07:15:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cl8Oq-0001qT-W1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 07:15:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47733 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cl8Ox-0000hr-4G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 01:15:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32918) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cl8ON-0000hh-7P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 01:14:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cl8OM-0001bs-CD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 01:14:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:38919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cl8OI-0001Sy-G4; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 01:14:34 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70E4E671A; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:14:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yhf-bt3qHSKL; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:14:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (static-dwadziewiec-jedenpiec7.echostar.pl [109.232.29.157]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E4E0E642B; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:14:28 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: <83h93dnf9h.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.110.48.8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212806 Archived-At: On 2017-03-01, at 17:16, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Marcin Borkowski >> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:22:55 +0100 >> >> I'm sorry to say that I'm a bit sad. A few months ago (maybe a year) >> there was a call to so some work on old, outstanding bugs. >> I volunteered for that, and while I did not spend /a lot/ of time on >> that, I feel that I did indeed help a bit. Then, I proceeded to >> actually fix a few bugs that were within my reach. I sent a patch >> fixing 21072, then a patch fixing one bug I did not formally submit (but >> both the bug and the patch are seemingly quite trivial), and then wanted >> to start discussion on 19873. >> >> Unfortunately, I have to say that I got very little feedback. There was >> some discussion (John's on testing, Eli's on my stupid mistakes etc.), >> but my patches/emails are mainly left there undecided. > > Can you tell which bugs are those? I'd like to look them up and see > why they stalled. As I said above, 21072, 19873 and one patch submitted here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-02/msg00707.html > > In general, if there are no unresolved issues raised during the > discussions, you just need to ping the bug address once a week or two, > to make sure the reports don't fall through the cracks. OK, I'll do that. > Thanks. Best, -- Marcin Borkowski