From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: git-handler.el Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 18:42:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87k2263xue.fsf@detlef> References: <87eftk9uxe.fsf@bernoul.li> <87zic7ze06.fsf_-_@detlef> <87d192aold.fsf@bernoul.li> <87o9rmiems.fsf@detlef> <877ey9cb9l.fsf@bernoul.li> <87inhstx2y.fsf@detlef> <87wp67suba.fsf@detlef> <83a833ilnl.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1502729043 2292 195.159.176.226 (14 Aug 2017 16:44:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:44:03 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Jonas Bernoulli , Emacs developers , Dmitry Gutov To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 14 18:43:54 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dhISr-0007n0-TH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 18:43:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33513 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dhISw-0004Ii-UH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:43:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36971) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dhIRf-00041A-Tm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:42:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dhIRf-0003Qd-4t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:42:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:57765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dhIRZ-0003Nw-EY; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:42:21 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.53.239]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LzblK-1dUSHg1EJe-014nnS; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 18:42:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Yuri Khan's message of "Sun, 13 Aug 2017 22:08:55 +0700") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:qlluDtAXYzFR2oqDOQtipba8nIgPhkllxiq4QqDI1lMVZhUaK5s iotuuoYZVCzQtsCVQuSqgFUpXDlNMUURKVJw9arhHmbCE3BedgYIGigp+cdgzSBuAWQcC9H bHyusHwEoHJq2OH8++6xIVceJOg9LruHMVEDgvwPXSjlV0rcEbVso1rtrxlZ7e23ishdqZE xqEnFGKuB8SivckhOhWkg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:NXRsgHNObek=:3CZo25X1oKrvORwIhwRM3n rbzSWSZGgeFm0qSZ5nFvldaBxQZjphnwj4ORYfes9/2QLOwq8dhvgrC6nU8fxNUYp5BOo+utk IED9xS60GfpLDpmBjbTp3eI+iyqAw6dyOM8L+pNdPllzwbUk8DJzJKnMRuiKXg3heODReILle TG+eXa6ol5fl7Bn569jSfQgA0F/AFaBdzmm5FJXjxdepJ1QKgw5YT7SKuSCreVCKBbw5fKCIv SSt8AtLa9p3lOXJmyx7eUav0vGp8M0e9rM2VTXD5/eG0E9qf8ExPNq3TjwZVQNeyYVboB7vlh XQ5OcilJI3/DdhX3z2Xv9/OZ2Fp+bx90NHxfKpQA8NODa0pzYin4QeUDWT+cHLyjYTkCdZjwT 2hdLMj9FMhrkuJqOZpdYDLYmRIARSi8t/xrki30LkbX+IPGoSoyNMnj3jOjmwcJnZFFCIOat9 dIna7cY7zeZp83+IKrtvDqPnDXJfIZ0W/Z7V/asxGh6Rv46fb5mpNvd7PZMBwOOS8j639ZIge 0nxSvlvZ4LcNcfVXznT3Ta93c+TSg6Y+l5i9/zE+QY4dkHWcPqziJtuTOfT9xrb04f+oIno0U u43pqXMpGfJqy40RfQT+EsDQDVh6+0OfbHvx9fN8DwopHPdMvpOF8bAiIRYyZDCPDj2BeSR1H dlfSyX97FFNYXEqbU/UBLAOGenp4uFYdXX43PDGOTrSM4G61WC2TOPiT4KXmcimOiPllMX3tz rm5jwk9uM1dxCVyWF5eOWOto0SnbHf8KTYFGOrAXBeqJ25btw7iQC/KHlNy/Nw1lzZKc//ly X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:217543 Archived-At: Yuri Khan writes: >> Then you should look inside src/emacs/lisp@@/ef7a18a071, I think. Why >> is that a problem? > > I got the impression that, in the proposed scheme, @@ > only shows files under that are modified by the commit > . There is no problem for me if it shows *all* files under > that existed at that . Both approaches make sense. Maybe we shall spend an option to control what is shown. Best regards, Michael.