From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gnus work Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 22:21:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87k20apstn.fsf@gnuvola.org> References: <87vajudasc.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507182969 28790 195.159.176.226 (5 Oct 2017 05:56:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 05:56:09 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 05 07:56:06 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzz8e-0006xH-T7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 07:56:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37922 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzz8m-0005Cf-BI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 01:56:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzz8c-0005C6-UJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 01:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzz8Z-0002KO-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 01:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.agora-net.com ([67.59.132.6]:49499) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzz8Z-0002Jl-Oz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 01:55:59 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by mail.agora-net.com with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dzz8W-0004Pe-Ht for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 01:55:56 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1dzqAv-0002nl-LG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 22:21:49 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87vajudasc.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Wed, 04 Oct 2017 11:32:03 -0700") X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ttn@gnuvola.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.agora-net.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 67.59.132.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219104 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () Eric Abrahamsen () Wed, 04 Oct 2017 11:32:03 -0700 3. Look at unpicking functions so that there's a clearer demarcation between code that does server logic (marks and whatnot) and code that does UX/presentation stuff. What do you mean by "unpicking functions"? Should that be read as ADJ N (functions that have the "unpicking" quality) or V N (the action of "unpicking" applied to functions), or something else entirely? I dig the zen feel of the sentence, anyway. :-D =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen ----------------------------------------------- (defun responsep (query) (pcase (context query) (`(technical ,ml) (correctp ml)) ...)) 748E A0E8 1CB8 A748 9BFA =2D-------------------------------------- 6CE4 6703 2224 4C80 7502 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlnVQtcACgkQZwMiJEyAdQLM0ACcCpgN5DV5yo9bH8wqenwNLlD3 VuQAoJeqVDRXWYYhyodEN1rvXwNIcyaj =aRcE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--