From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28605: 26.0.60; Part of leftmost character hidden Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 10:52:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87k20864kq.fsf@gmail.com> References: <59CB5D69.7040404@gmx.at> <59CE05F2.1010202@gmx.at> <59CE8E74.5010308@gmx.at> <59D35549.6030905@gmx.at> <87wp4c750c.fsf@gmail.com> <59D4A45F.5010606@gmx.at> <87tvzfjfcp.fsf@gmail.com> <59D5E8F6.8080002@gmx.at> <87efqikk0x.fsf@gmail.com> <59D73C40.7050604@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507279991 19434 195.159.176.226 (6 Oct 2017 08:53:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:53:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ola Nilsson , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 28605@debbugs.gnu.org, Kaushal To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 06 10:53:05 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0ONV-0004Vk-0o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 10:53:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43606 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0ONc-0004DZ-8K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 04:53:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0ONV-0004D9-KU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 04:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0ONS-0006w5-IR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 04:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43453) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0ONS-0006vV-Cm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 04:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0ONS-00088t-2p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 04:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 08:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28605 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28605-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28605.150727996931278 (code B ref 28605); Fri, 06 Oct 2017 08:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28605) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2017 08:52:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52134 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0ONE-00088N-8w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 04:52:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:49606) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0ONC-000889-6i for 28605@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 04:52:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b189so6219572wmd.4 for <28605@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 01:52:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+oXHuDcTezl5yniZ5Nx/5FvLFcj0Zujur+bmeo3h/KE=; b=BughdzpXbVKGGq4LdgKFa9FCdP4GCleSXs4TmdoQimgViu/5SCS4CLI+BEeSqIp+/y Pt7eeVxTDb8nLch3+IID53quaufou5mlxHsTQT4eBXcmuIZY8/PkGXkJsBCA8/yBuzEW GqF3jSsndrIYaBKPoOF3ZVgcGaO8HvOEgyfNyCp5PQG+EATNupnw57i3HD118V2R2U9l cSIsST86k0FPCmfaM9VSGef5fHhLivchbByeFy5JQCnBIasxyJv0cVB+fQOmwfUA2t+9 HrLv88FAztQWCfO3H70AdhGFtXBmJQKUB1Edxdf+sKyDoexFQfuRTFm1rLSDBMOeVAOM RHkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+oXHuDcTezl5yniZ5Nx/5FvLFcj0Zujur+bmeo3h/KE=; b=RZqnEa/EALrOPxZRjCFVbbn8Zlu9JYxlEb3cqioRN+uqdRUkXSFOEHYaAaIsoD2feJ PowKDM28CCh35By+CM7lG7Ram6O3sYGLjnz1qTD087Yt2oO0NhydlPr9WYSujQKbVGbH DI5fUmSFn8+wCFaHzVWuur8dULaBtoRE4E0W6XOvaUSHs6zUF0GjMrq7SlOzFkoyje7w T419s0NjC+rWxJ1QiYHltkShz1ljkVqRogRs3qSoh2pXEixSxbLhbhUogf4O3EKkLtKT hGtOriFwTliA0hBWzlD7vE+FdLS4fk8PilvSwV1CEZyX+By5XWC4fL0ckCpqo5CmTRwp 4fVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaW0y5FTg9Xmz+xpwnXbT+SUFPw4PJcApH3PfkO0/D0IrWcabPUb 4ThEycwa4c1kGaD4XrDR1lo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QA453xx4XLh+9k30oa0f707rcePbkLioABNNWLBwst0AsU+eLDTyLehez/N1JLTLeIfdBMNxA== X-Received: by 10.80.164.1 with SMTP id u1mr2311857edb.11.1507279959325; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 01:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r25sm937728edm.4.2017.10.06.01.52.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Oct 2017 01:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <59D73C40.7050604@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 06 Oct 2017 10:18:08 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:138006 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> The horizontal fix is somewhat cargo-culted from the vertical case, >> so I'm not 100% sure that this hunk is correct (why is it only >> adjusting the width and the x position? Should it adjust the height/y >> for the horizontal case?): >> >> + { >> + /* Clear under old scroll bar position. */ >> + oldw +=3D (scale - 1) * oldw; >> + oldx -=3D (scale - 1) * oldw; >> + x_clear_area (f, oldx, oldy, oldw, oldh); >> + } >> > > The entire horizontal scroll bar code has been cargo-culted from the > vertical one so any adjustments should probably go the same way. It doesn't seem to make any visual difference, but if eg oldx =3D=3D 0, and oldw > 0, oldx will end up negative. That makes me uncomfortable :-) >> I sent off a request to assign@gnu.org more than a month ago, and have >> heard nothing back (and have also pinged the copyright clerk at the >> FSF). Help? > > It's relieving that you have sent a request already. Unfortunately it > seems normal that this process takes a month at least. Let's wait for > two more weeks and ask Richard if nothing happens till then - maybe he > can help us speed things up. OK, we'll wait some more. >> False alarm. Looks like my window manager is not giving Emacs the >> correct height when I maximize the frame, so the window behind it was >> showing through (although I guess that could also be an Emacs bug, >> just not related to this one, since it happens without scroll bars). > > I'm quite confident that setting =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise=E2=80=99= to t will fix > that. Some window managers are very strict in the sense that if an > application prefers frames getting resized character-wise, that wish > prevails over the desire to maximize frames to the size of the screen. Hmm, I'm not sure that helps. 'toggle-frame-fullscreen' does the correct thing, but using the maximize control in the title-bar doesn't (but that also doesn't give me proper full screen, just full screen minus the widget bar along the bottom of the display). I think we can safely ignore this one and say it's my local problem. Robert