From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24 Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:30:02 -0500 Message-ID: <87k1wbnpit.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <6eh8u7x5be.fsf@just-testing.permabit.com> <87375r7f0g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <9f1e7a1f-bfc0-43a4-9acb-cf69b85587be@default> <5C8038D7-FF85-4C42-A728-F3F85CDAC85C@permabit.com> <87efpb46sp.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <3EB0E53F-4B99-44C2-9F2E-1125A33E408B@permabit.com> <87r2rvb7c2.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87po64npva.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83wp0bqjug.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1516552159 15731 195.159.176.226 (21 Jan 2018 16:29:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:29:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: 29165@debbugs.gnu.org, raeburn@permabit.com, p.stephani2@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 21 17:29:14 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edIUV-0003Qy-Po for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 17:29:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36330 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edIWW-0004Ym-6U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:31:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53937) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edIWP-0004Ya-7l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:31:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edIWM-0002jr-4G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:31:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edIWL-0002jm-W9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edIWL-0000Zi-MM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:31:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29165 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 29165-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29165.15165522132157 (code B ref 29165); Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29165) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2018 16:30:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37236 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edIVY-0000Yj-O6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:30:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179]:39949) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edIVW-0000Xf-SA for 29165@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:30:11 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id t22so6977377ioa.7 for <29165@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 08:30:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=H2f47AZj1Y7+axsUtGKOnU2OTVjHE4YQVcTiI7sQWGA=; b=bSsnFz8MFgLVuaIGWvM57FWgIASrp+zuww51jLcRXsqjYLWotd6zjkWZx1Z2jJznTp xxh8Q8tadizPMwXUx9mstPy24NCC67Mov+Ue/LqhiSyMXzA+5PLyNczzEqZcKHMw1BmL paTzvpcNtZmvd7RBT6+YzSBKmoHjTOXCaRJeAkURw3qYVp2mUYzyAvXHO2CpxT/Rm/0f KBUE7uD6c+QQxnrAzzn+C0tG/0IPPmS71D7BDef6k9pBZA6iyj+eF4jEOvoujKAVbxWm 8s6e8ecBm3CVsKwtFzRuVARkBnMSMvpAayoPRe0hR1wEvc4H/Tb5FmWx0SUeE3WktdIf avgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=H2f47AZj1Y7+axsUtGKOnU2OTVjHE4YQVcTiI7sQWGA=; b=HtYGgjPoAdkl4h5RZCt7qG21mSlpiI+Htq+aYm/E5gZ7683AptahVFrWhZkLUydNTq DVSiM1YSanWNtHDMHg3oqBFk+tsq4Jb3RLRpt+XMsF4rMJEIuwjtfJ4CDAMy+P+yR0Qj 3mwH/42rtNPWq2Pw79QBBD1EYZCrVvfo3wwRfCbghAgNaJqmjppGvoov1c09KdyYlUSu 5jMQSATRYcBmtJS6OHvTTRu8bXQsbsNqMFa17YbZNpBd+dglRm18lupkFohQSP1qQOmp SAQ9ah6J44T5eyfHVIcyCsafT0hACaRiHWZ1Nk8W4DIxKho0pPpKh7K1lcT1RlJEPtvW fjlA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcaAXvZtE26/ZI1JVWoy6s750nUbkqePMXuaxuWsZ0KwMrDK8bR /NjFvGti8NhHmIRINCrV+kc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225BqZzvmqkgdpetMq6QHxuR+nA7vl7xbs/1NbK4SGMwz27R9H4ruvCX2UN0nP8zpJeDaOShAA== X-Received: by 10.107.9.208 with SMTP id 77mr5452382ioj.195.1516552205308; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 08:30:05 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zebian ([45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 140sm4135003itx.3.2018.01.21.08.30.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 21 Jan 2018 08:30:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83wp0bqjug.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:04:23 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142349 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Noam Postavsky >> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 17:10:17 -0500 >> Cc: Ken Raeburn , Andreas Schwab , >> Philipp Stephani , 29165@debbugs.gnu.org, >> Stefan Monnier >> >> I probably should have got around to this before 26.0.91, but I think >> this should still go to emacs-26 because the patch makes the behaviour >> closer to what was in v25. > > Is it important enough to justify one more pretest, after 26.0.91, and > delay the release by a few more weeks? Because that's what would be > needed if we install this on the release branch. Hmm, no, I think these edge cases are not important enough to delay the release. > Besides, this change was introduced more than a year ago, and we did > that in clear understanding that it changes behavior. So "closer to > Emacs 25" doesn't sound like a convincing argument in this case, > because we gave up that similarity up front. Well, the unfortunate thing about waiting is that we get more strict in v26 and then turn around in v27 and (partially) reverse the decision. But still, as I said above, not worth delaying the release over it.