From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Amin Bandali Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Show *compilation* only if build did not succeed Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 14:09:06 -0500 Message-ID: <87k1k1tm3x.fsf@aminb.org> References: <87h8f5fvdo.fsf@aminb.org> <87ftupxxdl.fsf@aminb.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1545505672 4841 195.159.176.226 (22 Dec 2018 19:07:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 19:07:52 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 22 20:07:48 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gamcl-00018k-Q3 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:07:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52615 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1games-0005aS-3q for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 14:09:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42851) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gameJ-0005aK-Nu for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 14:09:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gameI-00046h-0t for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 14:09:23 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gameA-0003pU-6h; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 14:09:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [2607:fea8:3ba0:f85::5] (port=51708 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1game3-0005By-8g; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 14:09:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 22 Dec 2018 13:21:31 -0500") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:119023 Archived-At: On 2018-12-22 1:21 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > BTW, is the `goto-char` override really effective? > It doesn't affect calls to goto-char made from byte-compiled code, so > there's a good chance that it ends up not doing anything. > Ha, I think you=E2=80=99re right :) Taking out goto-char and set-window-po= int don=E2=80=99t seem to have any effects, that I could tell at least. Out of curiosity, is there any way to silence the =E2=80=9Cad-handle-defini= tion: =E2=80=98compilation-start=E2=80=99 got redefined=E2=80=9D warning locally?= I tried wrapping my workaround in a (let ((ad-redefinition-action 'accept)) ...), but that doesn=E2=80=99t seem to do it.