From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 19:05:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87k1epnh98.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <838sv6cmwt.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516202327.5cgy2s4kppy3ahxa@Ergus> <871s0yqg2i.fsf@telefonica.net> <3210C8E9-7A74-47D6-81A0-470948E6D09C@gmail.com> <87r28xq0j1.fsf@telefonica.net> <5495188F-7A7D-4E50-82C4-E2CBABD8633D@gmail.com> <20190517060858.xoddgzyudvo4p2oo@Ergus> <20190517092120.GE9018@tuxteam.de> <87imu9p4c1.fsf@telefonica.net> <15cc0f33-24e1-7524-80da-a0a27c6eb162@yandex.ru> <20190517163709.GC26501@tuxteam.de> <87o941nhy8.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="203890"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 17 19:06:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRgJI-000qsY-1B for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 19:06:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51353 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRgJG-0005jV-Ng for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:06:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRgJ4-0005jP-8Y for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRgJ3-00033Y-8c for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=42774 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRgJ1-000317-8b for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:06:04 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRgIw-000qOM-1x for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 19:05:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:cbcW9I9nlbUQ/YIJAd49P4D97qY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120502 Archived-At: Óscar Fuentes writes: > I guess that Dmitry knows the xref method fairly well :-) > > (Doex Hit Send too fast. I was going to ask if it is possible to freely edit an *xref* buffer and then apply the changes just like wgrep does. The existence of xref-query-replace-in-results seems to indicate that the answer is negative...