From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#675: 23.0.60; Edebugging track-mouse Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 13:21:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87k18zfysb.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87r237g95z.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8yb65rz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="239899"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: bojohan+mail@dd.chalmers.xn--se, 675@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 20 13:28:31 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Nv-0010J7-MC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 13:28:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59596 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Nu-0000f8-Io for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:28:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36383) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Hg-0002Bb-P2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:22:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Hf-00073e-9S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Hf-00073O-3H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:22:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9He-0005gd-6T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 675 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 675-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B675.157157047521777 (code B ref 675); Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 675) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 11:21:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53907 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Gr-0005f9-DC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:21:14 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:45928) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Gp-0005f2-TE for 675@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Gm-0006YD-D3; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 13:21:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83o8yb65rz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 14:00:16 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169790 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> But back to the original problem: (input-pending-p) is non-nil here, >> but it's because of a mouse movement, which edebug doesn't care about. >> >> I guess edebug really cares about unread-command-events here? So >> changing the call to just examine that instead might be the fix? > > Can Edebug bind while-no-input-ignore-events to something appropriate > to rectify this? Hm... I'm completely unfamiliar with that variable. @defvar while-no-input-ignore-events This variable allow setting which special events @code{while-no-input} should ignore. It is a list of symbols. Perhaps the manual should mention what kind of symbols? Anyway, I can't see that edebug calls while-no-input? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no