Re: jit-lock-antiblink-grace

["João Távora" <joaotavora@gmail.com>]

João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:48 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> This is encouraging, but please try C-n near the end of xdisp.c, so
>> that it includes syms_of_xdisp.  The first 350 lines of xdisp.c is one
>> large comment, and there's a very small number of strings after that.

> 30 seconds from syms_of_xdisp (void) in src/xdisp.c:
>   with antiblink: 34969, around 7% load measured by Process Explorer
>   without: 34977, also around 7% load
>   
Hi Eli,

We seem to have lost track of this, and it's waiting for your input.  I'd
like this change to make it 27.1.

To summarize, the benchmarks you suggested (paging down the file with
C-v and C-n) all confirmed "no performance hit".  I also tried a couple
of C-f/C-b benchmarks to the same results. 

If you need to gain more confidence from more benchmarks or a refresher
on exactly what this change is about, I'm at your disposal.  If you
think you're OK with the performance aspect, I'll perform the changes to
the docstrings and NEWS that we had agreed to previously.

João