From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45631: 27.1; regression: message-forward-ignored-headers no longer applies when forwarding as MIME Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:17:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87k0s7r39o.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87mtxq7xmd.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87y2h71qj5.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtxn6k69.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <878s961hmq.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtxgq0qo.fsf@gnus.org> <87ft385v27.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87czybh5nl.fsf@gnus.org> <87ft36jj83.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <878s8qxn0t.fsf@gnus.org> <87turei1j9.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87lfcpsjr1.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1mgj3v5.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7372"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Robert Pluim , 45631@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 20 17:20:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2GE6-0001l0-T5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:20:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38344 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2GE5-0002RO-Ri for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:20:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2GCE-0000us-El for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44460) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2GCE-0003M9-5I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l2GCE-00032Y-02 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45631 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45631-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45631.161115949011630 (code B ref 45631); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45631) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2021 16:18:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56006 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l2GBO-00031V-Gb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:18:10 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:46156) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l2GBK-00030x-KI for 45631@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:18:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Us4iETrC0TmqNJR4Z4d5V4Ia3AEYXkKZnSnZQA6cg6M=; b=RKs6s8/QBxCqp+5dAnxnch489E DKSiop+C5ttidtEx7yAyh7o82pbUI30mcI8lwBU7UMx6cGJFPAmrcd+PY7blKngmA0M1IIRR7x2iZ DfgZbqxvKE27Hy2U6ir8jqJbdiUH4aVZwuuQGt1Lg+IIs2rEGfGaA4UA7LE3v035gFP8=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2GBA-0001GP-Pk; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:17:59 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAGFBMVEUiKDkGAwYeGiRc SCdcJAujWw7tvkD///9yuJSCAAAAAWJLR0QHFmGI6wAAAAd0SU1FB+UBFBAQLuJ0dQcAAAGQSURB VDjLbZPbkYMwDEWFK0Aa9t/WsgXskAaSECrAqWBx/yWsJJtHwMzEGXzQvdbD0GDrkBnw9MAvogv7 O911CQYIDp/3CrqHgRZgDxnvtuYI4j1iXFdokJDcybkLKPL0YbKdSn/g6sAfzA+AAokPX0Eb0PPV RYBp+Qpg74hX+1fO0ICeiVb7GB/Yjw8axZx1cy3vO874iiOP+u7UpWhNi4AURwOt7K/HnZKCZTap Y3mn9CdAQkDbcch8Sgv+pJRmMGPYEuyeN+zeEpI3PJzKRXZKz/5aRSjfhxqQ6WmrIOB1rKy14J1v qgDcXt04DDcuUo3fut5LCvLcv9+WYKmwBL9sP8190lqJ0pp3DkhLLxFeC1IS73RX4biBfN4vBVG1 3tpzFhc0tR8zUFiKKC0n+38O0nTRWlJJWcP2h4dhsEYFmbpwybwFSbtWK5nc2lTLp97xZaRLPy6d letpcxX2a9Dl2e1za4NNYwbRAOokknjwh9QzS1E4G5dGHcv7mSCAaB0uLt1WoO5ciQiqdh6TfxW5 dCpjs1zAAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIxLTAxLTIwVDE2OjE2OjQ1KzAwOjAwP2Ki3AAA ACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0wMS0yMFQxNjoxNjo0NSswMDowME4/GmAAAAAASUVORK5C YII= X-Now-Playing: Joe Jackson's _Live 1980-86 (2)_: "Memphis" In-Reply-To: <87r1mgj3v5.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> (Daniel Kahn Gillmor's message of "Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:19:58 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:198268 Archived-At: Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: >>> Either or both (or neither) of these variables might be applied in any >>> of the three scenarios. If both are applied, i have no idea which order >>> they are applied in, so applying both is probably not a great idea. =E2= =98=B9 >> >> Both are applied. > > In all cases? I think neither are applied in case 3, right? > > At any rate, if they're typically applied in tandem, it seems like their > help text should probably refer to each other -- this discussion is the > first place i've learned about message-forward-included-headers :/ Indeed. >> We can't change when they're applied, because that will break people's >> setups. So we have to introduce a new variable for 3). > > In case 3, neither are currently applied. > > The only thing i'm asking for is to apply *only* the blocklist in case > 3. What setups will that break? It's just surprising behaviour -- that Message will strip a completely different set of headers based on what forwarding method is used. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no