From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Manuel Giraud via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Android port of Emacs Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:51:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87jzvzopob.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> References: <83v8fnslfz.fsf@gnu.org> <83edmask4z.fsf@gnu.org> <874jn6fue3.fsf@yahoo.com> <83zg4yr1tf.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0qaee6b.fsf@yahoo.com> <83jzw2qy0l.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Manuel Giraud Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37959"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Po Lu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 19 09:52:34 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qB9gg-0009fB-Dl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:52:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qB9fr-00020V-OE; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 03:51:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qB9fp-000201-HD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 03:51:41 -0400 Original-Received: from ledu-giraud.fr ([51.159.28.247]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qB9fl-0006qr-Ov; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 03:51:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=ed25519; bh=1e856n9d DSUAw2/NItTT17pB5QwZ4f2kWYvxnSX5UYo=; h=date:references:in-reply-to: subject:cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=VXCZLlr3Sn26aq1V8qs+1cZ2N3IgpH H3jdKFQ0dLdOI35PHarXSDiLgYBL6jQtzi6M38qZETes24CbqVWdNVDg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=rsa; bh=1e856n9dDSUAw2/N ItTT17pB5QwZ4f2kWYvxnSX5UYo=; h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject: cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=TUsG6FswKoy+gNu1U8VpYgt7QIHfMp4OezLkeJ hii5HNFr1qtzEAaccJA+XaSjdbAoKWIF/NBT+qmkdwuhMRehDyRz9vjqQiTifvwFhEunWG PcqVycB8uLsHEWIYCSMgUoVlpkSua324bnaLINOHiveENw0VaRltrLrZ47AVmZi/p785ua lKRwU9DnXZTeKRDpDcQPJbAN3ygbXCcXwBPSZdM0gGI3FXkmmUGhn0u/PEZOO5BVJl86tR HBBSQpXpUq1HNH+qwbqZeIO1CfPbIuQWmZPAr6RoB1anxRZzv1piCsGBXu0ViVENC9B2ck uYkr/scWLewpLZTF+aR7ivFQ== Original-Received: from computer ( [10.1.1.1]) by ledu-giraud.fr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 43ff41d1 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:51:33 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83jzw2qy0l.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 17 Jun 2023 11:43:54 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=51.159.28.247; envelope-from=manuel@ledu-giraud.fr; helo=ledu-giraud.fr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:307030 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: [...] >> So far, the only Emacs developers who have expressed an opinion here >> have been you and I. So perhaps we should bring some other voices here: >> who has any names in mind? > > Yes, please speak up. Hi, I'm far from being an Emacs developer but here is my 2 cents anyway. As Eli said he would not be opposed to drop the NS port (for it to be handled somewhere else), why not =C2=AB=C2=A0trade=C2=A0=C2=BB the NS port = for the Android one? Should the Android port become stale (with zero dev or whatever), we could later drop this port too? --=20 Manuel Giraud