From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Faces for strong, emph and friends in Info? Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 11:01:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87jzl6syde.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86o7ajyk6v.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7ajssgp.fsf@gmail.com> <86jzl7yajk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15917"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: raman@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 09 11:02:40 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ru7NH-0003sb-U9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 11:02:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ru7Mh-0006YH-J5; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 05:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ru7Md-0006LR-Nb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 05:02:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ru7MX-0000Y9-NK; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 05:01:58 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-346359c8785so127254f8f.0; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 02:01:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712653311; x=1713258111; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=JYafE+yXObuYnqvHw2Fr6tUB3bqeDyTD47axsVx4vYY=; b=hXO95Gbg9zMExnV1S9PHBmo7sGiPmH53j1jZTcmZfXFEscNIJCIMkw9VB2Y8K+5IXg EVMibRvDG4slwZGRTgV97yHMKSkriN3eTI5FLnXfQ2qiNYwAFTmR6wleLxLNU+qhwTSS b7K2X2gitMMpejhi4tSfm9Bq+Riahk0dlyrutQMecmcCO7hRrtmt9LQsUPDVRbjoaqFD WcS9Uql55reZ/KL6Ugm/1mIhcU9XDOcylXN49+fOo3U5vKwXu+xKtdY9e+2I1XWL2Med WIwi0/R6qhVlmto5cUIoO/3E1l8ZGp45j4aA9AIZBOCm6+IxOEhZWQm1QDTKOmHRDsUi aGRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712653311; x=1713258111; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JYafE+yXObuYnqvHw2Fr6tUB3bqeDyTD47axsVx4vYY=; b=WkLyngVYhwzjxVLQ/gomgz13Q5cqkxK0A54gzMxHlCGwRjc6CROOb4bbQOofofTnoX 05jyGonfSkQf/5Wo4dk3E4VnW017kl0AkFxR4MCvU+4kqZad6GBKuOYMXwViZKs4vZZ4 W3XfKdbEd1e1rfpIAycYySlfO9Il+7eP1l+Im27Cb8JU9tpvSsfmmjSXsAJneIr2s4MB VXcfOrhX0veUirS8z6pdCfFrbm4NLNN3LXee45aY6MXNlWdEh5D7e70TCj3/7kLUSRVj ozVatIXgtFE7dpKe4YuQyTnYSUN/BFHCFNy8cuSNdCntODQNZNxPO2tsQgLWu+NZmuQl gsKg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVx3o2TzkJahlYx4zftO7tt7XLFTcnb0NX8LuUa/iuYdKs0jOdh5leT72y8njNj700OyaA+mdLwNJou20WWdoS/I9Pj X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywt0MELttpxHEXRcgpnQU83kFAxrjRgkejssUvS/rz2zrQ1R2LZ unCxOjNIDoI1qaX6GU7tgcVED2IXj8oUKCEyQ/pvT2HGRhP/VB1K/kHFAoZP X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFXLJ06RIhkYnMd44xMbh2/q8G10ucbvM0H4fA/TwrKXW4I/8txSSAp2EXC1sA7G9kyKXBG/g== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4643:0:b0:33e:7f51:c2f8 with SMTP id j3-20020a5d4643000000b0033e7f51c2f8mr6947467wrs.36.1712653310963; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 02:01:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dx18-20020a0560000e1200b00343d840b3f8sm10900140wrb.33.2024.04.09.02.01.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Apr 2024 02:01:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86jzl7yajk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 08 Apr 2024 21:27:43 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::429; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x429.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:317642 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 21:27:43 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Cc: "T.V Raman" , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 18:57:10 +0200 >>=20 Eli> I think it's just that no one has written the code to show *foo* a= nd Eli> _foo_ as italics and bold (and hide the _ and * characters). Of Eli> course, this will cause some lines be shorter or longer than they = are Eli> supposed to be, but maybe this is a worthwhile price to pay. >>=20 Eli> Patches welcome. >>=20 >> How robust do you want this to be? Eli> As robust as possible, of course. >> +(defface Info-strong >> + '((t :inherit bold)) >> + "Face used for *strong* elements." >> + :version "30.1") Eli> We need fallback for terminals that don't support bold. Some Eli> stand-out color, perhaps? I guess. Let me see if I can plagiarize^W seek inspiration from eg Gnus, that has all sorts of angry fruit salad stuff Eli> Also, the doc string should mention Info mode. >> + (while (re-search-forward "\\([*_]\\)\\([^*_\n]+\\)\\([*_]\\)= " nil t) Eli> This is too fragile, I think. It matches stuff like "*Note foo_", Eli> which can happen in cross-references, for example. Also, what if Eli> @emph or @strong spans a newline? Yes, would need fixing. I don=CA=BCt think emacs regexp search supports backreferences, so it will be less elegant. Regarding newlines, do you have an example? It could be added, but I=CA=BCm not sure if we want to pay the price of excessive searching (although this code is run only once per node). Robert --=20