From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: pranshu sharma Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Add function to rotate/transpose all windows Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:34:02 +1000 Message-ID: <87jze9sr2d.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87setpdv21.fsf@gmail.com> <878qvcgqpu.fsf@gmail.com> <0138d382-8e63-4b53-8c2c-fece826a7d0a@gmx.at> <87plooaw1w.fsf@gmail.com> <87v7yeykr0.fsf@gmail.com> <19ca7821-e034-4ae5-9ff6-570243329d74@gmx.at> <87r09224pe.fsf@gmail.com> <87ikudk62k.fsf@gmail.com> <0d879e95-c37e-416d-b439-daa6384c4f30@gmx.at> <878qv8kws2.fsf@gmail.com> <87ed4xvf60.fsf@gmail.com> <861q0qfnhr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878quxdant.fsf@gmail.com> <86zfndi6wh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zfncuqhu.fsf@gmail.com> <86v7y00w68.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87y12smubh.fsf@gmail.com> <96ea5140-9043-4c1b-97f3-4c534296355e@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2639"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Juri Linkov , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 15 13:32:10 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t0fmc-0000Yb-LL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 13:32:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t0flt-00066r-0A; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 07:31:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t0d0M-0002Q7-TM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 04:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t0d0L-0005sz-EG; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 04:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20cb47387ceso26507165ad.1; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 01:34:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1728981247; x=1729586047; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pgaKxX7H2k/wWIdrhunb+fPsCBtaV0Yn6hEnUFalq28=; b=Y6ZNZ/d1v6LWz2p10B9kubiRkZWsVQ7BNGo/DHQC+JA2Jr3qsUK52EwkBYxwkPDBOG gIko5bcSsNVeAu1lSdgoO0+UlMmoefJqLUsyQCg+CVzlaE3MD8m521Qdy75Fwv70F7WO fDVZQAiCf3T30DO6mOFGo4YWCet4h+2I9eb+BMLRf7YnwEMR8n97rW4pnNBDHUKl1p34 x8E/g4At96xajI3q0HpaojJ8oQ8FmlY3VCXjbROifFy7o4JmIj+RiIfHCQ0bwdL+ItjV 6dHKDJ3bLTu4QjnY93vxhbsZ0ob08IhOw0nh/JgIv/wvbMhD2TBaqRcWiiUlJwU1wESd pwpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728981247; x=1729586047; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=pgaKxX7H2k/wWIdrhunb+fPsCBtaV0Yn6hEnUFalq28=; b=Qgv7tsrqZErNCTIl+hBRJJ7wHrsBjo27fhydhp/JyJIRtGh6XGPw3fQBkQ2wigx5EA lx2eQylzwP301e8E9LHwmr65XFGTSAfOOFWM9TIFRZFm2j7Mk2+cZhzLgUF3sPFxZ26a 3w/0g4FU4uKvGpOsvw8k94tvhpslGOxg9d1RD0RazT3dUfO0kpSyNmimJK0b73lG8Y4J uGlCqydrYkLq+fW3n4Y/vaawK9TAOZDsQOEOn5vhBNkPeSqPHzJ6T60Otz20ycoGe0Te osQfEXG7yNEpaxjjw1Lz5lGS1c2h41qk+bCee9ZCwMUEzBCVQvfoA1C563U/IIT89fGf mkgg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWneZUTvmxrm/l7PWKKARYNaHkUP0KQU8zY0R6cJ8kePf8QWssVKQAn6HlEUoAW6e1Go35X@gnu.org, AJvYcCWzxa/HjzYy8YaC7ds48E+xJp9IN7MtQJDQGRZKNdbY/c5f/xi4pCArTDtgXwrBWy+YCG+hdVcbu+E8C3s=@gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyPvllKnCXpxKiDFMGV7RBHakWeGNp5LpTtP5B/uJztjrIJULci fViKj1eeSvvXMGqq7JOcM89Ndnx9ysOQe4pHZ79SXEey9RUrpR4GQ8oQBd3H X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEDXiIoB04iZKGR5zk4O+oUpNwpFnvVflh73L+4S0a+ldzB9rvFdj2UP84FtgHgq+Qow7kpHw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ec86:b0:20c:d04a:a53f with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20cd04aa691mr136594595ad.58.1728981246979; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 01:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from pebl ([2001:8003:7816:8300:4e72:594:f1ca:25b2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-20d180366a8sm7267475ad.165.2024.10.15.01.34.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Oct 2024 01:34:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <96ea5140-9043-4c1b-97f3-4c534296355e@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:17:58 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b; envelope-from=pranshusharma366@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-x62b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 07:31:22 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324592 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >>> Then keybindings could be like these: >>> >>> C-x w r a rotate-windows-anticlockwise >>> C-x w r c rotate-windows-clockwise >>> C-x w r h flip-windows-horizontally >>> C-x w r v flip-windows-vertically >>> C-x w r t transpose-windows >> >> Yeah this seems good. > > I'm not sure whether "horizontally" and "vertically" are good terms. In > the past, people complained that for example 'split-window-horizontally' > could mean side-by-side or at some horizontal axis. Maybe > 'flip-windows-left-right' and 'flip-windows-above-below' would be better > and should be reflected in the key mnemonics somehow. I think in terms of flipping the window, horizontal/vertical don't really leave that much room for interpretatin as split-window-horizontally. flip-windows-left-right above-below seem kind of clunky tbh, imo we should just go with horizontal/vertical, I mean, worst case users will learn it by using it, or reading the doctring. 99% of users should already know from split-window-horizotnally and it's counter part what horizontal and vertical means in the context of window. But I'm also fine with left-right, only problem is that it will make searching through C-h f and 'C-h m' a little bit weird