From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unicode Lisp reader escapes Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 09:25:43 -0400 Message-ID: <87iroarr9i.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <17491.34779.959316.484740@parhasard.net> <87odyfnqcj.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <17498.27200.911709.330947@parhasard.net> <877j4z5had.fsf@gmx.de> <87irohfrx1.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147526771 21222 80.91.229.2 (13 May 2006 13:26:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 13:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alkibiades@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 13 15:26:06 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Feu88-0008M0-JC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 May 2006 15:26:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Feu88-0005LA-13 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 May 2006 09:26:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Feu7w-0005Kn-K1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 May 2006 09:25:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Feu7v-0005KN-5L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 May 2006 09:25:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Feu7v-0005KK-07 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 May 2006 09:25:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.34] (helo=tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Feu9r-00070y-Bv; Sat, 13 May 2006 09:27:47 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.55.147.184]) by tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060513132544.QYTG29052.tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Sat, 13 May 2006 09:25:44 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A7265D7754; Sat, 13 May 2006 09:25:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 13 May 2006 00:52:05 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54383 Archived-At: > At least you now understand it's not trivial. Why do you > think it's worth doing at this stage even if it requires > nontrivial work? > Because this is a serious cause of unreliability. I don't see why you'd think so. Could you expand? Stefan