From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Can org.el replace planner? Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:32:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87irmw6p1d.fsf@tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FseSy-0004HM-I8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:32:20 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FseSw-0004Gq-GN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:32:20 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FseSw-0004Gl-7N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:32:18 -0400 Received: from [129.199.96.40] (helo=nef2.ens.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FsedR-0006uz-PS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:43:10 -0400 Received: from lumiere.ens.fr (lumiere.ens.fr [129.199.80.1]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id k5KBWGhv057404 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:32:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [129.199.80.178] (helo=tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk) by lumiere.ens.fr with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FseSx-00088H-UQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:32:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Leon's message of "Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:29:10 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Leon writes: > Currently I'm using planner as my daily tasks organizer. I'd like to > try org.el, but I can't figure out what is it good for? So here is the > question: can org.el replace planner? Could you give a scenario where > org fits? I've been using planner (and emacs-wiki then muse) for nearly two years. I'm now using org.el and the switch was quite easy. I think one of the advantages of org.el over planner is that each task is a *heading* so that you can store additionnal information under the task. With planner, this additionnal informations are stored within the project file -- reaching them is not as straightforward as it is with org.el. More generally, org.el appears to be more flexible, so you can adapt it to whatever kind of project do you have. Best, -- Bastien