From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Romain Francoise Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:48:17 +0200 Organization: orebokech dot com Message-ID: <87ircdvlem.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> References: <87hcryfjkh.fsf@zip.com.au> <200704022335.l32NZgOp027657@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <87648efhbs.fsf@zip.com.au> <86ps6m7y36.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175593701 19419 80.91.229.12 (3 Apr 2007 09:48:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:48:21 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 03 11:48:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HYfcd-0005Y0-4t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:48:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HYffl-0000bM-1D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:51:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HYffh-0000bH-Ad for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:51:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HYfff-0000au-BF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:51:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HYfff-0000ar-5K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:51:23 -0400 Original-Received: from yeast.orebokech.com ([82.67.41.165]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HYfcW-0008SR-9e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:48:08 -0400 Original-Received: from pacem.orebokech.com (unknown [192.168.1.100]) by yeast.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CECE12DBA for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:48:06 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by pacem.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5B0B5241A; Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:48:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Face: }9mYu,e_@+e!`Z-P5kVXa3\_b:hdJ"B)ww[&=b<2=awG:GOIM (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue\, 03 Apr 2007 11\:17\:35 +0300") X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4 (tstamp-) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68981 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > They already did: at least one Debian user told me in some forum > (I think gnu.emacs.help) that "C-h F" and "C-h K" didn't work > because the manuals were not there. C-h F and C-h K are new in Emacs 22, and the Emacs 22 package in Debian (emacs-snapshot) ships all the manuals (for the time being). Perhaps that user was running Emacs 21, in which case those keys wouldn't reach the manual anyway.