From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug trackers Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:40:28 -0500 Message-ID: <87ir0kv7kj.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <20080218052546.GK13020@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20080218232829.GM5438@volo.donarmstrong.com> <47BB63DD.5000203@gnu.org> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203464486 28184 80.91.229.12 (19 Feb 2008 23:41:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, Don Armstrong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 20 00:41:50 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JRc5l-00021r-So for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:41:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JRc5G-0006d8-UU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:41:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRc59-0006aG-78 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:41:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRc55-0006VE-8H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JRc54-0006V3-TW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:40:58 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([66.146.193.61]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JRc4s-0002gQ-LU; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:40:47 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38402 ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JRc4f-00019I-Lf; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:40:33 -0600 In-Reply-To: <47BB63DD.5000203@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Tue\, 19 Feb 2008 23\:18\:53 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89616 Archived-At: Jason Rumney writes: > Richard Stallman wrote: >> The issue here is to consider using a bug tracker. To change the way >> we package Emacs would be a completely different issue (and I don't >> think we should do so). >> > We wouldn't necessarily need to package Emacs, just partition > responsibility for the bug reports as if different parts of Emacs were > separate projects. > > It might be useful for major packages that are already separately > developed, like tramp, c-mode and gnus. Folks, let's just try it and see how it works. Discussing it in advance of trying it will not be productive, I think.