From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: [Emacs 22.2] Re: Idle timers with the active minibuffer Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:46:32 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87ir0fqxlz.fsf_-_@jurta.org> References: <87k5otd3jx.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203796803 32753 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2008 20:00:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, Johan =?utf-8?Q?Bockg=C3=A5rd?= To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 23 21:00:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JT0Xp-0002oy-NM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:00:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JT0XK-0003GU-5u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:59:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JT0Wf-0002hL-0L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:59:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JT0We-0002gS-2J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:59:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JT0Wd-0002gD-L5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:59:11 -0500 Original-Received: from relay03.kiev.sovam.com ([62.64.120.201]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JT0WZ-0002SS-LQ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:59:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [83.170.232.243] (helo=smtp.svitonline.com) by relay03.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JT0WV-0000yJ-F5; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:59:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:29:36 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Scanner-Signature: ef6c50392af5ec65634338665e82f3c2 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: juri@jurta.org X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Header: Not Detected X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 2291 [Feb 22 2008] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {HEADERS: header Content-Type found without required header Content-Transfer-Encoding} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 11 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90149 Archived-At: > There is a NUMBERP test in both versions. > > That is correct. (I find it hard to read unified format diffs.) > So it won't crash. > > It looks like reverting the keyboard.c change is ok. > But first let's see what Yidong has to say. > There must have been a reason why he made that change. It seems this bug should be fixed before releasing Emacs 22.2, because it causes the regression comparing with Emacs 21. But I don't see what implications revering keyboard.c will have. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/