From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lexbind Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:04:38 +0900 Message-ID: <87ir02w0op.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87ir02fqlw.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204671436 1421 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2008 22:57:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , rms@gnu.org, Miles Bader To: "paul r" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 04 23:57:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWg4o-0003FQ-Sv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 23:57:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWg4H-0000FB-Kt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:57:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWg4D-0000Ee-LP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:57:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWg4C-0000EK-IZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:57:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWg4C-0000EH-GT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:57:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWg42-0002pX-8K; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:56:50 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEF27FFD; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 07:56:46 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 568651A29E5; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:04:38 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" a883e09e54f7 XEmacs Lucid X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91331 Archived-At: paul r writes: > In the spirit of the (lexical-let ...), a possible improvement could > be to have a (lexical-defun ...), What improvement is this over (require 'cl-macs) (flet ((...))) I guess it requires two less levels of parentheses, and one less level of indentation. Anything else?