Re: os x integration ?

Re: os x integration ?

[Charles philip Chan]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 783 bytes --]

cezar@mixandgo.com writes:

>   Is there any way to have org-mode integrate with OS X better ?
>
>   There are a few GTD apps out there for OS X that do a nice job at
>   that: (THINGS, OmniFocus, Anxiety, etc). Some have a global shortcut
>   for adding tasks from anywhere (THINGS and OmniFocus), other have a
>   sexy icon in the top bar (Anxiety, Dejumble).

Not from every where, but you should be able to define a few terminal
services (by using emacsclient) in Terminal.app to at least make it work
with selected file items in Finder.app or capture text put into the
paste board. However, YMMV since I use GNUstep and not OS X.

Also, there will be better integration between OS X and Emacs once
Emacs.app is complete (getting very close) and merged back into Emacs.

Charles

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 193 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Re: os x integration ?

[Cezar Halmagean]

"Charles philip Chan" <cpchan@sympatico.ca> writes:

> Not from every where, but you should be able to define a few terminal
> services (by using emacsclient) in Terminal.app to at least make it work
> with selected file items in Finder.app or capture text put into the
> paste board. However, YMMV since I use GNUstep and not OS X.

That might be too much for me right now :)

>
> Also, there will be better integration between OS X and Emacs once
> Emacs.app is complete (getting very close) and merged back into Emacs.
>

Is that better than Aquamcs ? 


Cezar

Re: Re: os x integration ?

[Charles philip Chan]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 541 bytes --]

Cezar Halmagean <cezar@mixandgo.com> writes:

> Is that better than Aquamcs ? 

From what I see on the Aquaemacs web page, it is based off Emacs's 22 while
Emacs.app:

http://emacs-app.sourceforge.net/

is based on the unicode-2 branch of Emacs (now Emacs 23). The main
difference is that Emacs.app have full native unicode support and will
keep up with the changes in Emacs once committed to the Emacs cvs
tree. Also, I am not sure how much of the Aquaemacs GUI is written with
appkit since I have never used it.

Charles


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 193 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Re: Re: os x integration ?

[Charles philip Chan]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 428 bytes --]

"Charles philip Chan" <cpchan@sympatico.ca> writes:

>> Is that better than Aquamcs ? 
>
> From what I see on the Aquaemacs web page, it is based off Emacs's 22 while
> Emacs.app:
>
> http://emacs-app.sourceforge.net/
>
> is based on the unicode-2 branch of Emacs (now Emacs 23).

I found more info comparing the two here:

http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-app-dev-@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00293.html

Charles

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 193 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Re: os x integration ?

[Cezar Halmagean]

"Charles philip Chan" <cpchan@sympatico.ca> writes:

>
> I found more info comparing the two here:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-app-dev-@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00293.html
>

I don't see nothing about Aquamacs there.

Cezar

Re: Re: os x integration ?

[Charles philip Chan]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 527 bytes --]

Cezar Halmagean <cezar@mixandgo.com> writes:

> I don't see nothing about Aquamacs there.

,----
| Carbon Emacs provides the most recently released version (22.1, June
| 2007) of GNU Emacs for Mac users.  Emacs shipped with Leopard is also
| Carbon Emacs (you can complement a dummy Application bundle to run it
| as a GUI app).  Also, Aquamacs Emacs is (currently) based on Carbon
| Emacs.
`----

So it seems that Aquamacs (at least for now) is based on Carbon Emacs
where as Emacs.app's GUI is pure Appkit (Cocoa).

Charles


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 193 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Re: os x integration ?

[Cezar Halmagean]

"Charles philip Chan" <cpchan@sympatico.ca> writes:

> So it seems that Aquamacs (at least for now) is based on Carbon Emacs
> where as Emacs.app's GUI is pure Appkit (Cocoa).

Aha, thanks for that. Any idea what might be the advantages of using
Emacs.app over Aquamacs ?

Cezar

Re: Re: os x integration ?

[Charles philip Chan]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 329 bytes --]

Cezar Halmagean <cezar@mixandgo.com> writes:

> Aha, thanks for that. Any idea what might be the advantages of using
> Emacs.app over Aquamacs ?

Don't know, since I have never used Aquamacs (I don't have a Mac and
Aquamacs does not support GNUstep). However, I can tell you that Emacs
23 is a lot nicer than Emacs 22.

Charles


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 193 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode