From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Switching to bzr: what Emacs developers should know? Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:42:31 -0400 Message-ID: <87iqguaou0.fsf@canonical.com> References: <874osi6zpe.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <28c656e20908081151h55a4b566v4cfc7c49c5ca2a37@mail.gmail.com> <87ljlukjxz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249969414 31819 80.91.229.12 (11 Aug 2009 05:43:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bastien , B Smith-Mannschott , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 11 07:43:27 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mak8t-0002Nu-7G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:43:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45612 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mak8r-0004r3-IJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:43:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mak84-0004gT-Dt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:42:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mak83-0004fw-EH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:42:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44607 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mak83-0004fi-6d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:42:35 -0400 Original-Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:38848) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mak82-0006Cl-Ma for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:42:34 -0400 Original-Received: from hutte.canonical.com ([91.189.90.181]) by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1Mak82-0002mx-6W; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:42:34 +0100 Original-Received: from cpe-72-225-235-182.nyc.res.rr.com ([72.225.235.182] helo=kfogel-work) by hutte.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mak82-00049R-24; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:42:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:23:21 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114035 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> (Note: it=E2=80=99s not clear whether we=E2=80=99re going to continue = the habit of >> keeping a separate ChangeLog file, now that we have a version control >> system that supports atomic multi-target commits. We should figure >> that out at some point.) > >> What's Emacs maintainers take on this? > > Check the mailing list, we've been very clear about this: we're only > going to change the underlying tool for now, so ChangeLog aren't > affected. I've updated the wiki accordingly.