On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:41:26 -0500 Glenn Morris wrote: > Stephen Berman wrote: > >> report included two long backtraces and perhaps the length is a >> problem. > > For future reference, gzipping the backtraces reduces the size a lot. D'oh! In the meantime, the first backtrace made it to the list, but not the second one, so I guess it was by itself too large. So here's the next try, gzipped :-). This backtrace resulted from typing `C-c C-z' (comint-stop-subjob) in shell-mode. Steve Berman