From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-selection-mode Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:57:25 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87iq8u0x6i.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <877hpa68ys.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <20100318092421.GA2704@muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268906938 26354 80.91.229.12 (18 Mar 2010 10:08:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:08:58 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 18 11:08:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsCeq-0000Ql-Rj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:08:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35136 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NsCeq-0004Ra-83 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:08:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NsCU6-0005c0-7I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:57:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39883 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NsCU4-0005aj-61 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:57:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsCU2-0004ol-BX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:57:44 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:57332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsCU2-0004oW-5p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:57:42 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsCTy-0004Kb-OF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:57:38 +0100 Original-Received: from p5b2c2262.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.44.34.98]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:57:38 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by p5b2c2262.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:57:38 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b2c2262.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3fk0iPOmHevBIoGsjUbBNcFfjx4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122151 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie writes: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:49:23PM -0700, Drew Adams wrote: >> > From: David Kastrup > >> [rabid foaming at the mouth elided] > >> It's interesting to see you respond to that call, indicating that you >> now use transient-mark-mode, albeit without delete-selection-mode. Good > ^^^^ >> to hear there has been some progress. What made you switch to t-m-mode? > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> [more frothing and foaming trimmed] > > All these excerpts from your post are likely to be interpreted as > inflammatory and derogatory. Topics like this are heated enough as it > is. Could we all please be careful that what we write here CANNOT be > interpreted as casting aspersions on somebody else. I don't have the impression that this would be compatible with the point (or was that the mark?) Drew is trying to make. > Thanks! You are welcome. -- David Kastrup