From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill Wohler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr: conflicting tags: mh-e-doc-8.3 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:18:45 -0700 Organization: Newt Software Message-ID: <87ipokv3sq.fsf@olgas.newt.com> References: <75k49315wb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87mxdwv7ex.fsf@olgas.newt.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316715549 9850 80.91.229.12 (22 Sep 2011 18:19:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:19:09 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 22 20:19:05 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6nrU-0000TD-S9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:19:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33861 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6nrU-0004am-Du for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:19:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49057) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6nrR-0004aS-9k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6nrP-0007Qe-Rm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:19:01 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:40638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6nrP-0007Qa-K6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:18:59 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6nrO-0000QX-77 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:18:58 +0200 Original-Received: from c-67-169-87-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([67.169.87.56]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:18:58 +0200 Original-Received: from wohler by c-67-169-87-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:18:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-67-169-87-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z6E8uSTVHPwCJJZSZeSF87xX0Qo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144199 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Bill Wohler wrote: > >> I had no idea that deleting a tag and recreating it would have this >> affect. > > How did you do it? Did you use bzr tag --force the second time, or > something else? No, bzr tag --delete ; bzr tag >> This does seem like a bug in bzr though. The pull should update your >> local copy of the tag, shouldn't it? > > I think it is probably an existing bzr bug (lack of versioned tags?), > but don't worry, I will make a report. Thank you. -- Bill Wohler aka http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD