From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA update Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:26:34 +0900 Message-ID: <87ipobh6v9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87y5xavz8i.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87fwji2d8o.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ehz1ds54.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87wrcsrczf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878vp8ahsr.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87y5x8poj5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k48s60fn.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87pqikgnc5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <8739ffn3dl.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317299222 14374 80.91.229.12 (29 Sep 2011 12:27:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:27:02 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 29 14:26:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9FhZ-0001nP-QL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:26:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41454 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9FhY-0004W1-Kc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:26:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9FhS-0004Vs-N7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:26:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9FhM-0001s7-Us for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:26:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:48516) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9FhM-0001rJ-JW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:26:44 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A99A970608 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:26:35 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0BAB11A3409; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:26:35 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <8739ffn3dl.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0a1 under 21.5 (beta31) "ginger" 6c76f5b7e2e3 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144472 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > I don't see what's wrong with my proposal to have a `elpa-dev' branch > for unstable and `elpa-stable' for stable packages; merging `elpa' into > `elpa-dev' will be a much clearer sign to publish a new version than > incrementing the version number (which, as we know, is often > unparseable). Nothing. I was responding to P.J.'s suggestion, which wasn't bad either.