From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10395: 24.0.92; line-prefix text inherits face properties from the preceding line rather than following text Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:30:25 +0800 Message-ID: <87ipkokm0e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83obuosuhm.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325921474 23564 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2012 07:31:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 07:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10395@debbugs.gnu.org, David Edmondson , Miles Bader To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 07 08:31:10 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjQk9-0002Y6-O2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 08:31:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59142 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjQk9-0005Vl-1N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:31:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:32818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjQk2-0005Vf-P3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:31:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjQk1-0003Z2-LJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52976) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjQk1-0003Yy-Ic for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:31:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjQk2-00031x-EO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 07:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10395 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10395-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10395.132592144511624 (code B ref 10395); Sat, 07 Jan 2012 07:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2012 07:30:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47648 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjQjj-00031P-CO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:30:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:35159 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjQjf-00031F-KX for 10395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:30:40 -0500 Original-Received: from bb220-255-176-96.singnet.com.sg ([220.255.176.96]:47652 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjQja-0003rl-VF; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:30:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83obuosuhm.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:09:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55486 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > So my vote is to leave this as it works now, and maybe document this > to avoid surprises. Agreed about leaving this alone for now, though I'd rather not commit to documenting it as "the" behavior just yet. OTOH, the "expected" behavior would be for the line-prefix not to inherit face properties at all, much like overlay before-strings.