From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Tabs are ready? -> Let us give a definition of tabs. Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:35:28 +0900 Message-ID: <87ipjkzla7.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <4F2E5D33.6020406@gmx.at> <4F2E8185.4080706@gmx.at> <828vkhuptb.fsf@gmail.com> <1D86CE94D8474775B07E86D943F6B604@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328499347 3205 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2012 03:35:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 03:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Andy Moreton' , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 04:35:46 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RuFMj-0008U5-JJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:35:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49135 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuFMi-0005sp-LP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:35:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34981) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuFMf-0005sk-Pz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:35:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuFMe-0005v8-Mf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:35:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:53120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuFMe-0005u8-B0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:35:36 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FDD9707D3; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:35:28 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E8D31A282A; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:35:28 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <1D86CE94D8474775B07E86D943F6B604@us.oracle.com> X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta31) "ginger" e6b5c49f9e13 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148226 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > One possibility, which is not very pretty but pretty much > distinguishes these tabs without committing to any particular uses, > would be to call them "tabbar tabs". Just a suggestion. Why not just call the feature the tab bar or tab control, avoiding mention of the "tabs feature"? Then the individual components can be naturally called "tabs" when you need to refer to the GUI control that gets clicked.