From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11039: 24.0.94; Window incorrectly getting selected Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:05:25 +0800 Message-ID: <87ipi1gm6y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wr6i2ezh.fsf@gnu.org> <4F662E00.5080309@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332137202 30020 80.91.229.3 (19 Mar 2012 06:06:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11039@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 19 07:06:41 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S9Vjr-0000w0-QB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 07:06:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46533 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9Vjq-0004EY-TY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 02:06:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60259) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9Vjo-0004ER-FN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 02:06:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9Vjm-0008Vz-Mh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 02:06:36 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9Vjm-0008Vr-JO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 02:06:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S9WDG-0004Md-7q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 02:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11039 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11039-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11039.133213897516717 (code B ref 11039); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Mar 2012 06:36:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56366 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S9WCU-0004LZ-Ib for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 02:36:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:35766) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S9WCJ-0004LJ-Js for 11039@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 02:36:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [155.69.19.1] (port=40342 helo=ulysses) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9Vin-0004xj-DA; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 02:05:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4F662E00.5080309@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:48:32 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57883 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > This is the default behavior since 23.1. If you don't like it, you > can customize `help-window-select' to nil. Ah, I didn't remember the existence of this variable. What's the rationale? I went back and searched emacs-devel, and couldn't find any relevant discussion. The behavior seems rather counter-intuitive.