From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Does CEDET work? Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 04:03:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87ipgw8olq.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <87sjg07m94.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334801042 30609 80.91.229.3 (19 Apr 2012 02:04:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 02:04:02 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 19 04:03:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SKgiv-0000J6-3p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 04:03:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35704 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKgiu-0004ly-Fb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:03:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40091) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKgir-0004lX-6h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:03:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKgip-00071H-J5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60118) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKgip-00071A-CR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:03:47 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SKgig-00007l-JV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 04:03:38 +0200 Original-Received: from 103.red-79-147-11.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([79.147.11.103]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 04:03:38 +0200 Original-Received: from ofv by 103.red-79-147-11.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 04:03:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 103.red-79-147-11.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:gxUvwgBtDWxtlRTFMv305ak5vR0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149798 Archived-At: Leo writes: > Indeed. But the question is genuine. I have been comparing two python > editing environments: PyCharm (commercial) and Emacs. And the former got > decent parser for everything remotely related to python: js, html, xml, > css, sass, sql, coffeescript etc. etc not to mention python specific > stuff. I can appreciate such an intelligent environment and the enormous > productivity it enables. Mind your words. Some time ago I posted similar concerns here and received so much flak that I wouldn't dare to repeat the experience.