From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Evil defvars in org.el Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:48:27 +0900 Message-ID: <87ipgklm04.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <87k411g8xa.fsf@gnu.org> <877gx1pv19.fsf@gnu.org> <87vckls01f.fsf@gnu.org> <77ehr96ty6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <60598E65FC014449A6367EE5AD3568AC@us.oracle.com> <87obqclnj1.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <14D83E667A7A4C02AC561AA0BE25B7A9@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335574124 21601 80.91.229.3 (28 Apr 2012 00:48:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Bastien' , 'Chong Yidong' , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 28 02:48:42 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SNvq5-0001H5-T5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 02:48:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58655 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNvq5-0002UO-8j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:48:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58419) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNvq2-0002UJ-AX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:48:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNvq0-00014V-Oa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:48:37 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp11.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.73]:52289) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNvpw-00014B-Le; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:48:32 -0400 Original-Received: from 218.231.154.2.eo.eaccess.ne.jp ([218.231.154.2] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp11.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) (envelope-from ) id 1SNvps-0002Cb-G4; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:48:28 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 777B8DFC1; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:48:27 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <14D83E667A7A4C02AC561AA0BE25B7A9@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:17:42 -0700") Original-Lines: 16 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 203.216.5.73 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150100 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: >> It has somethig like dlet: >> (let ((foo ...)) (declare (special foo)) ...) > > Ah yes. Thanks for the reminder. ... I suppose since Emacs already pays attention to (declare ...) in some cases, it could do it in this case too... -miles -- Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle. "That's some catch, that Catch-22," he observed. "It's the best there is," Doc Daneeka agreed.