From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11808: IDO fails with tramp /ftp: Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:49:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87ipeb72dp.fsf@gmx.de> References: <871ukzr1wv.fsf@gmail.com> <70rqwwe0ycue94kwob72uru3.1340899750023@email.android.com> <87sjdfpfff.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340905867 5420 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2012 17:51:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11808@debbugs.gnu.org To: Vitalie Spinu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 28 19:51:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIrs-0004Z4-I1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:51:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45135 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIrs-0004St-Jd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:51:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53653) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIrm-0004Sn-OZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:50:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIri-0005or-3J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54265) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIrh-0005oj-W0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:50:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIvm-0001WT-5Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11808 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11808-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11808.13409060425772 (code B ref 11808); Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11808) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2012 17:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35575 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIul-0001Uu-J1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:56243) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SkIui-0001Uk-GA for 11808@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:53:57 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2012 17:49:41 -0000 Original-Received: from p57BB9799.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [87.187.151.153] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 28 Jun 2012 19:49:41 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+waJYmWGawOP08Y8MvybIMmeQfxGp+zVcLCczm+3 xif8FQ0TVdQYU1 In-Reply-To: <87sjdfpfff.fsf@gmail.com> (Vitalie Spinu's message of "Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:30:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61381 Archived-At: Vitalie Spinu writes: > Nope doesn't work with eddif-patch-file either. I guess diff got > corrupted. I don't understand the output. What does ! at bol mean? "Line changed". Don't worry, I'll produce a new patch tomorrow (or I'll send you the whole ange-ftp.el). Best regards, Michael.