From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13724: Calling 'org-babel-mark-block' with 'M-x cmd' and 'M-: (cmd)' Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:41:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87ip5te2e2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360961336 20292 80.91.229.3 (15 Feb 2013 20:48:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Thorsten Jolitz , 13724@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 15 21:49:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U6SDb-00061u-Cy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:49:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39531 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6SDH-0001k2-Do for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:48:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6S6x-0000ly-R3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:42:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6S6w-0006uG-AD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:42:23 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6S6r-0006tQ-II; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:42:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U6S7Z-0003Ou-MV; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:43:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Bastien Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13724 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,org-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13724-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13724.136096092512994 (code B ref 13724); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13724) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2013 20:42:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58164 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U6S6e-0003NW-PG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:42:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:41044) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U6S6Y-0003N2-Ne for 13724@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:42:03 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hi8so1648811wib.13 for <13724@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:41:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=+EaCv3aAQYx8oivVrgbcncHm1spRj7Ne9d3YIutDK5g=; b=eBMRU8WrWSXr2Qy6AlWOm7nWL+CDXkV/5NuGibaRy3gbeo3gjlGgKUsUOtNVPbwqPG grPUhVLpgbtAeARadIyNj+4kLcgJaBNu3MqzbF0vkA11RtqtKKDz0XKLjaGcHDoQ5OD+ zNwTPQKcCocQ3Fe5gt1ZjR5p/alFBlRjMH+3v14nX0aKKVuxUglM1n1VfLC7cZp2VHZS Jjuaei7FfqFbRk5TlzJQIYS7kpNRUeP0UFIFoef6gZ/pd6Rxsl+IpPHdS6nusyLHtSnV 8JbPUD/8M9T81WpXrXEcWJChdtQBLbKoCiciukJNci3cewEaac9lfa9OF7prFrpeq1+H 5D4Q== X-Received: by 10.194.92.231 with SMTP id cp7mr6798506wjb.19.1360960873619; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:41:13 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dw1sm7496531wib.5.2013.02.15.12.41.10 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:41:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 29F581C20D15; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:41:09 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:30:55 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71355 Archived-At: Let me restate the issue: M-x mark-word RET will highlight the word at point. M-: (mark-word) RET will *not* highlight the word at point. My understanding was that interactive call of mark-word highlight the region, while non-interactive call do not highlight it. Is this wrong? `org-mark-element' and `org-babel-mark-block' are not different to `mark-word' here. -- Bastien