From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15231: 24.3.50; eshell: variable `name' treated different from other variables Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:56:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87ioy6bk9y.fsf@gmx.de> References: <8761ule8f0.fsf@boo.workgroup> <87k3imssvn.fsf@dimension8.tehua.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1378969037 1487 80.91.229.3 (12 Sep 2013 06:57:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Gregor Zattler , Aidan Gauland , 15231@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 12 08:57:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VK0q7-0000rP-6z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:57:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39653 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VK0q6-0005I8-T0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:57:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40118) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VK0py-0005Ho-4c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:57:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VK0pr-0006EO-Uw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:57:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49418) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VK0pr-0006EK-RQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VK0pq-0004Dx-P0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:57:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15231 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15231-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15231.137896900216209 (code B ref 15231); Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15231) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2013 06:56:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57711 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VK0pU-0004DL-GO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:56:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:51027) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VK0pQ-0004D6-Un for 15231@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:56:38 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([91.41.133.211]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPS (Nemesis) id 0LnfuZ-1VsXp42O5P-00hvgq for <15231@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:56:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:50:41 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:eTl7va20UnS+BGThxtCXjT5+q0zMKut6k/EOzlj1X0+X8Agc3tQ aTXc3Cr/AhnfOKtVQPCLrvzUqNUjsK5csMSs8tkVjsJ35FUG1qmCueBvOlfP4vizLV/j+YH 7PbcPIiaYMVwYtRj2w8GguRAI+NkaUbsUB4+IKGVlrnO3TWcMYM0la4+dDwQysow19BP+aJ tt7axoPCGbKqeSxdYhlYA== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:78267 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I've just tried to convert Eshell to use lexical-binding and it appears > that this problem would indeed be fixed by such a change (if someone has > some kind of test suite for Eshell it would be very helpful, since > changing it to use lexical-binding is not completely trivial and might > introduce unexpected regressions). There is test/eshell.el. Btw, shouldn't it be moved to test/automated/ ? > Stefan Best regards, Michael.