From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improved git commit emails Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:04:59 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87iotu89s4.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> References: <20140108135200.8ECF9380834@snark.thyrsus.com> <2990610.kbiSx0fztg@descartes> <38592099.qd8IGjdgfG@descartes> <79eh4ifi7j.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> <87mwj68gwp.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389215028 7046 80.91.229.3 (8 Jan 2014 21:03:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 21:03:48 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 08 22:03:55 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W10I6-0003oI-Ob for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:03:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48925 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W10I6-0004g3-D0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:03:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38920) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W10Hy-0004fM-74 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:03:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W10Hs-0005th-GM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:03:46 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W10Hs-0005tY-9Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:03:40 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W10Ho-00038R-JX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:03:36 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:03:36 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:03:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 35 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bU0IWLHFahAWzUn+lWKpyGcHsas= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167809 Archived-At: On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 13:37:49 -0500 Glenn Morris wrote: GM> Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> I did something like this for Gnus commit e-mails (starting with an >> existing Git post-receive script). See >> http://git.gnus.org/cgit/gnus.git/tree/etc/post-receive and the e-mails >> themselves are at http://news.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.commits for >> example. GM> At first glance, the results look pretty good to me. Certainly much GM> better than the current elpa setup. Yup. It's basically what the Gnus developers wanted so it's probably close to what you'd like :) GM> I have no idea how it would integrate with the other solution that just GM> appeared out of thin air and is already the subject of a Savannah GM> support request (maybe someone should have tested that before bothering GM> Savannah?). *shrug* GM> Anyway, I'm going to invest zero effort in this, just bitch and GM> complain, like a bunch of people did about bzr. :) OK. If you or Stefan decide to use the Gnus post-receive hook for the GNU ELPA or whatever, just let me know and we can move it out to its own repo or otherwise make it a standalone tool you can depend on. For now it's a Gnus-only thing. Specifically for the GNU ELPA it could be better integrated with the underlying repo structure, customized specifically for commits against an ELPA repo. Ted