From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Generators (iterators) for Gnu Emacs Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:12:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87iohqrpex.fsf@web.de> References: <877fy77zhp.fsf@web.de> <874mtato99.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417799647 8962 80.91.229.3 (5 Dec 2014 17:14:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 17:14:07 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 05 18:13:54 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XwwRy-000518-Ro for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:13:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51556 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwwRy-0006PR-Ci for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 12:13:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwwRU-0006GY-Sb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 12:13:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwwRO-0001F4-Ra for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 12:13:20 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwwRO-0001Eq-LB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 12:13:14 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XwwRN-0004iH-GG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:13:13 +0100 Original-Received: from ip-90-186-215-205.web.vodafone.de ([90.186.215.205]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:13:13 +0100 Original-Received: from michael_heerdegen by ip-90-186-215-205.web.vodafone.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:13:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-90-186-215-205.web.vodafone.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Dsp4Xi4eM0tA4dexpcdi/fJh8Nk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178955 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > Uh what? The whole point of the make-symbol abomination is to get a > > symbol uniquely used by only one instance of the lambda function. > > This is _exactly_ in order to _not_ require lexical binding. > > AFAICT this make-symbol is there to avoid name capture. Yes, that had been the intention. To make it work with dynamic callers, I would have to defvar the uninterned symbol. Dunno if it's worth it. Michael.