From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ivan Shmakov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Let input queue deal gracefully with up-events Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 19:17:20 +0000 Message-ID: <87iofgf9rz.fsf@violet.siamics.net> References: <20150128145849.GA5107@acm.acm> <1422458343-12633-1-git-send-email-dak@gnu.org> <87egq4z2zr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423163873 17540 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2015 19:17:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 19:17:53 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 05 20:17:49 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YJRvv-00079J-0Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 20:17:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44827 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJRvu-0004aU-5M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:17:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54095) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJRvh-0004a2-4f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:17:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJRvf-0001ri-ST for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:17:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fely.am-1.org ([2a01:4f8:d15:1b86::2]:38107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJRvf-0001rc-JL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:17:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:References:Subject:To:From; bh=hbx9eToQpFxIZAGmlC/rXbPShGu8a8C2yJD7oFbSH/Y=; b=JUcNQ01FPm2hUWpuCInnQ/t5jBVQXz7hG+B/UYmQkmHQ9GDJlh0nx2JFWP/FbyHpOJsLS3/Trip0CY830qGYvOwzyyYrWBqHkMQR7aUZmeLeCu8BwfvziEXm8ChOzMo4CGegqMKwVAMtP8byKC+8ZkSmpAQqA4+IAv5OYx/S3mg=; Original-Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJRvd-0000Zc-ER for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 19:17:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJRvV-0004P3-OM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 02:17:21 +0700 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87egq4z2zr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Thu, 05 Feb 2015 18:23:36 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a01:4f8:d15:1b86::2 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182473 Archived-At: >>>>> David Kastrup writes: [=E2=80=A6] > I've created bug report > . Judging > from the number of wishlist items in the tracker including a patch, It=E2=80=99s a very rough metric at best. For one thing, the chances of a patch being applied tend to depend highly on the number of the Emacs developers interested in a particular subsystem or package at the given time. > that does not appear to increase its chances of getting applied but > at least it is then rotting in the proper place. One of these days I may actually decide to build an X-capable Emacs. Should it still be possible at that point to apply the patch cleanly (and assuming it won=E2=80=99t crash), =E2=80=93 I=E2=80=99d= happily push it. (Combined with that trivial improvement suggested during the preceding review, I guess.) As an aside, I was unable to try the midi-kbd.el package myself (hardly a trivial thing when you use a tty-only Emacs), but if it indeed works as described, =E2=80=93 I=E2=80=99d happily give my vote t= o it for the Emacs Contribution of the Month challenge. (Assuming we=E2=80=99d care to run such a thing, anyway.) [1] news:87lhlbmx7l.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/181124 --=20 FSF associate member #7257 np. Lock up the Wolves =E2=80=94 Dio 3013 B6A0= 230E 334A