From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:38:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87io63ol9y.fsf@petton.fr> References: <561A19AB.5060001@cumego.com> <8737xf9je9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pp0fm0j3.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3kusx8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83lhb26eb9.fsf@gnu.org> <876126key3.fsf@gnu.org> <83fv1a6bfu.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1weo7u9.fsf@gnu.org> <83zizi3qr0.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhb1n81y.fsf@gnu.org> <83si594wt3.fsf@gnu.org> <87io64iigs.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3kso1gr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wpuks5ek.fsf@T420.taylan> <83vba4i1z3.fsf@gnu.org> <87pp0cqgjf.fsf@T420.taylan> <83twpoi0sp.fsf@gnu.org> <878u70qf75.fsf@T420.taylan> <83mvvghydi.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445207902 12942 80.91.229.3 (18 Oct 2015 22:38:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:38:22 +0000 (UTC) To: John Wiegley , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 19 00:38:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Znwaj-0006aq-Q0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:38:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35740 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Znwai-0004f4-SU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:38:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55443) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Znwae-0004ew-Iv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Znwab-0006QH-DQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:50630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Znwab-0006Px-AT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:38:05 -0400 Original-Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA412018D for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:38:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:38:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=yrFUfW5EkE5ftBvtLxJ/cGZzYkw=; b=jwunD TWBdjFz6VdtaT6vPo6Ao/gXdkPU6yFx3lZYWV0A2wo1YBG1zGgsDJJ5C29HXSvVI 9ntN3VVHAy/e6sHwj4i1DJbn4Iv9IPJylWf9sh9yMIqSuMJ88DIJm23Y48ovPD22 fMd9V6MzDWCMqR4GpMTeiSV/6+iEIQgmovSMXM= X-Sasl-enc: fF9lUoFD2ZhO+EHodyKIfgBV4E23HJHgMkoRFnjBXeNI 1445207883 Original-Received: from blueberry (arennes-658-1-212-96.w2-2.abo.wanadoo.fr [2.2.169.96]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4BE0BC00013; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:38:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.50.7 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192018 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain John Wiegley writes: > Total agreement! I've been wanting a Guile-based Emacs since 1998, if for no > other reason than that I could have used call/cc in Eshell, instead of the > horrendous CPS hack that exists there now. Out of cusiosity, where is that used? Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWJB9JAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQU1oIAL2H2g8oI1j/MPnoBHlB7vfg VKxZtEG35HZnc4VF+KD3ls0YY1bwR2yf+VMPOzApDzuvzDo9H6vYUVx3FTfQ1L9C TDkhMRBfGVHSQsnHEzVXQT9S2QZJFNZpmbYG7+zSNyOmDnLQGc04gxtRkV9TFR9N 8zS0nvz0uDm8UnqC8kNQ493e7cgTu785ue31Vc2pB7xwJcReV6WqssHGUhXgkG7D UvofORNCvr5rCwX3oawuKRn7rf2UTmLXMDNX2SnrppxZYXz7jnkEoq/tuexVGs3O iOTojb4CizxmglJLAiYmBHrxVM/FqtHf7y53VSrSPF3voQPhBfhOTWx5M/uXVss= =piSp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--