From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23093: 25.0.92; Change for the worse: minibuffer completion window splits below rather that right Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:17:43 -0300 Message-ID: <87io0deyoo.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bn66ifc3.fsf@gmail.com> <56F1932A.3060507@gmx.at> <838u1a49qm.fsf@gnu.org> <56F24F33.5070904@gmx.at> <83twjx2pc7.fsf@gnu.org> <56F2E63D.9070509@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458764301 9883 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2016 20:18:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23093@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 23 21:18:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aipEH-0005qW-Kl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:18:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45904 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aipEG-0001xh-QI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:18:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aipED-0001xU-Ki for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aipEA-0001u7-EG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37672) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aipEA-0001u2-BL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aipEA-0004Ig-6u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23093 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23093-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23093.145876427116513 (code B ref 23093); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23093) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2016 20:17:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34799 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aipDz-0004IH-MF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:17:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:33993) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aipDy-0004I4-Ci for 23093@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:17:50 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f174.google.com with SMTP id m184so63285187iof.1 for <23093@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:17:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=JuIj3DhksWalexn+9LWylpnr/oGG6ttCClWpnf8lQzM=; b=mZJBmYnSaj2hEsc7tG4N9wAUeGaujupKTLYkNXT6g+FG+VcjY05J+tFpDuW/KLGNPa kpwwWY3/dsBB+s48oXQGw219H+idoW9EICvLhAMRvdhFbRPkTzB+zarEISyfUPUa2bNm /dFBSTTg9XswTpMTjH2UcNfyDPIsGldSQt/5NBgQltTAlplWJ6h+L3i6DVLbs6qNuqKy OcpmwNYNGangJDjnVEWn/5nLNZwG9mre4kiUGoeO67CMJx9IK1Aiy2oGU/MkyPzlmBkc MSmTVfYs17D6QjRV2roYmwoVYbSh3kB6m7JvURtcfIUC7/7uHu0Rl/PMTFhE0fccWRVf QzKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=JuIj3DhksWalexn+9LWylpnr/oGG6ttCClWpnf8lQzM=; b=XN1YOJIoN+V/ZEzJMwTmgeB8Q7NmLDxfYUw6Mov+yX8x0thQXYi6U6Itd+nJvX6Pdc 3Z1BLBbTMiOENAGEaeDSFw1o5xgfDefaetrVny78C67mmZ//wAH5yGsoD9s9UG+EMwfm o2Shj3I6Ws0LjCxw6ny2lBH6K5GtAv8URyyqUFLMjtLuT2XjHm5x7Qe2Uz0S/36929dE Q2lyHC8+kfuIewirwRaS81PvRF9qP/DKh7TVoEgOmVxOKONBGZY1OzPdKPC2RG9yPKID YMMtx7ejucnMtZ62560pFh43yr/BmyAOFVz0Vx5B2vgvZRSByXipmgXH7/LnLqrbj6If nOfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK+bWtudK+HHPfceShiE7oA5D/rliEG+saIQ4qVvK7cLzueVj2GgBZOjaAg9tZmhg== X-Received: by 10.107.43.2 with SMTP id r2mr5776037ior.156.1458764264883; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:17:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from moondust.nodomain.none (T86F8.WPA.Dal.Ca. [134.190.134.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b142sm1767252ioe.27.2016.03.23.13.17.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:17:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56F2E63D.9070509@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:53:49 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:115412 Archived-At: At 19:53 +0100 on Wednesday 2016-03-23, martin rudalics wrote: > > Please have a look at the attached patch. Hello Martin, I like your doc patch; it makes the behaviour clear. In particular the snippet of code it provides, viz. (customize-set-variable 'display-buffer-alist '(("\\*Completions\\*" display-buffer-pop-up-window))) works like a charm to get back the Emacs 24 behaviour that I seem to prefer at the moment. Thank you very much! Sorry to be suggesting more work, but I think a brief entry about the new *Completions* buffer display behaviour should go in NEWS, referring the reader to your new node in the manual for details and for information on how to restore the former behaviour. Regards, N.