From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is byte-compiled code supposed to call `make-byte-code'? Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 23:19:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87iny3rw6r.fsf@linux-m68k.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464124799 2160 80.91.229.3 (24 May 2016 21:19:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 21:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Pogonyshev Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 24 23:19:50 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b5Jjx-0000E4-FO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:19:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55409 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5Jjw-0004ry-5x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:19:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58971) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JjR-0004ri-5e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:19:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JjM-0006rP-UO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:19:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:35072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JjM-0006qc-Nu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:19:12 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3rDpFB0Xljz3hjKj; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:19:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3rDpFB0K6lzvhMc; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:19:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Do755_pIm1BQ; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:19:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: KC31FpGq1vwfcrBJixKL30dX2+g9wulObH1RzPG56CqbL24MHXsIMuhPWTgI1D0D Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-0-243.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.0.243]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:19:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 80E5A2C1E0E; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:19:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: YOW!!! I am having fun!!! In-Reply-To: (Paul Pogonyshev's message of "Tue, 24 May 2016 22:58:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 212.18.0.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203986 Archived-At: Paul Pogonyshev writes: > Is it supposed to build closure bytecode object every time? Shouldn't > it be considered a constant? But it isn't a constant, it depends on the function's argument. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."