From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master c8ee570: Suppress undesired error messages in filenotify-tests.el Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:35:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87inok7cok.fsf@gmx.de> References: <20170207204223.17232.75787@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170207204224.F29C22301C@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <5fh944r37s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87r3387ecd.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486579074 6558 195.159.176.226 (8 Feb 2017 18:37:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 18:37:54 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 08 19:37:51 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cbX7l-0001Ue-6m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:37:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60936 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbX7q-0000c5-UW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:37:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60514) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbX64-0008Iq-Ol for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:36:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbX64-0006Cu-4B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:36:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:62865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbX60-0006BJ-AA; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:36:00 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([93.197.208.125]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MRoRF-1czMRg29t3-00SyMe; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:35:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87r3387ecd.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:00:02 +0100") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zAq6486Al+Hl+FEUvuhiPwSwSSSAko5gIs1YoSX4QGT12bs32SY H7qS7uwY6n5u+b98JwcTrwKM8fkgEh11WqR0Q5mvMAMicnvHvx4B0PxXD1HGcF8sLlVgStD BSNXv8F0aNj03uJDhF2X5pLSp5MnWLBOdAn2UUhW1LgynbRVkAOHDkTGhFmujzc5tv50ZNC x7MJyBx7+nTKHREHQgjIQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:UPIssZIMiiA=:JQHKuUR3rbuYLKBdnHSdk4 QCqUHuFuMHEOJBb0fe4Eou/1nOnX9UtxEm4JDfHz5/whNAdc6TKkM4qEVxJmo5370RFpiI7y/ 1mSHaIXAGV4aZ2GCfLHBfyyggtkuDc3iEfRsejGwtoZ4PWDuT+9Gh+a0v9O0xql93aucDUoOH fX2KciuDCdlix8YLL1FBS7I1QJsgloIn3BPsNjY0qzD5jH5bCA+StFwv0Erw/kIkxBhgsx7Se PKW3PG9C618IvVaeeBiGzB+Ez6gQPLhPbBbGk0aWAWKSlGwXZMxZqy4SlNOR+HZawBopV4D/M GBgYBCHyEq0U2jwJaxNoK2Sa42EVRlbZADcWTPiWb0AgAgNC92zwfLggiUrzOhTWs8CgGHwdB 2jHZe9LVQl1eA0IIEEXh3920PGdrSyl1HRnlcByfz5fsiUgRZj/6Xle7oBtDyuPj+SbDeFVXM qd3LrWD94EdBC3Ewbxd0NvofxUft8mI7+1SNVAEP/guHfqchRaepyz9lzRhTYfjf8nki7Gwnc f5bBBlAQXaQ0g7iyq2gOUQZMBawg7OGvfoRSzYUpUshIG/7rbnAz33dCg7NAlcwYKoHmV+w+R HYBRqdeC4OwWs6vsRt8sjKjrb09dJow7H7f5/dvHiLGgy9IOzgzUYBQXFSxMYLLc7Z3Zfkjk2 SrGl3WCoABrLXoS6dsQ7xTf15xH+lmiY6eL8eUm3DtE7BeaA4HJ+/J/5VoxAACx73F/Tvyaw3 cy6Y37eXBZ0dedgsjnMncYtHdPSohiaq5c39edpQdGyyrGi8gAGKkU4aHVjJfGYJ+Iv1BZz5 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212145 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > I'm aware of the problem. I've tried to use `cl-letf' in the > test. Unfortunately, this doesn't work, because the revert is called > when an event arrives; the `cl-letf' settings do not work there. > > Hmmm. Usually, the test is not called by average Emacs users, so I > believe it would be acceptable. If not, we must find something else. I've modified my patch, using an advice. This shall not harm outside the test. Best regards, Michael.