From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A problem with old bugs Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 07:16:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87innl627t.fsf@jane> References: <87r32h9zj4.fsf@jane> <87efyhcmxz.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <87poi19ldj.fsf@jane> <87y3wio83o.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488867399 5543 195.159.176.226 (7 Mar 2017 06:16:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:16:39 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Phillip Lord Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 07 07:16:35 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cl8QB-0000jh-FY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 07:16:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47740 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cl8QH-0001I7-MJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 01:16:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33409) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cl8Pm-0001I0-3q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 01:16:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cl8Pi-000461-Uz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 01:16:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:38964) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cl8Pi-00045O-O9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 01:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38040E671A; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:16:02 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7WLgP34zMFUo; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:15:59 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (static-dwadziewiec-jedenpiec7.echostar.pl [109.232.29.157]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E06D2E642B; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:15:58 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: <87y3wio83o.fsf@russet.org.uk> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.110.48.8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212807 Archived-At: On 2017-03-06, at 14:19, Phillip Lord wrote: > Marcin Borkowski writes: >>> If not (no write privs), why not? What are you waiting for? >> >> Nobody gave them to me. >> >> What should be the workflow once I have them? I assume that I branch >> off fresh master, push my branch and write here - correct? > > > Emacs doesn't have a well developed branch merge workflow. In general, > people push things straight onto master. If you are unsure whether your > patch is good, then asking on emacs-devel, then no one complaining for a > while is probably a good sign. That's interesting. I'd be a bit afraid of pushing to master, if only because I have a habit of compiling Emacs from master from time to time... > At the end of the day, try and get it right, but breaking Emacs is going > to happen and it's not a disaster. I've done it lots recently! ;-) > Phil Thanks, -- Marcin Borkowski